Semantic Manufacturing Analysis for 3D CAD Risk Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing requirements derived from 3D specifications in computer-aided modeling often lead to late feedback and are siloed, requiring human expertise to identify risks or opportunities, which can be disconnected and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that identifies features of a product model using geometric, physical, and systems elements with semantic labels, creating machine-readable semantic links to an enterprise knowledge library, thereby alerting users to producibility risks or opportunities and providing solutions through semantic relationships.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional human review methods are used to identify manufacturing risks, then expertise knowledge can be applied, but the process is slow and feedback is late

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk identification accuracyVSAvoidfeedback timing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human review processes with an automated computer-implemented system that uses optical character recognition (OCR), natural language processing (NLP), and machine learning algorithms to extract, analyze, and evaluate manufacturing requirements and risks from 3D CAD specifications, eliminating the need for human experts to manually review documents and providing immediate automated feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing risk identification and analysis without requiring human intervention at each stage - the computer system autonomously extracts requirements from 3D models, cross-references them with manufacturing databases, identifies conflicts and risks, and generates recommendations, allowing the manufacturing analysis to serve itself without continuous human oversight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If disconnected data and siloed review methods are used, then human expertise can be utilized, but the process becomes inefficient and fragmented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpertise utilizationVSAvoidreview efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges previously disconnected data sources and processes into a unified automated system that integrates 3D CAD model data, manufacturing requirements databases, risk assessment algorithms, and recommendation engines into a single cohesive workflow, eliminating siloed review processes and enabling seamless end-to-end manufacturing analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by creating a multi-functional platform that can handle various types of manufacturing requirements (geometric, material, process, quality), analyze different risk categories, and generate comprehensive recommendations across multiple manufacturing domains, replacing multiple specialized human review processes with a single versatile automated system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual specification review is performed, then design requirements can be evaluated, but manufacturing risks may be omitted from design specifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecification complianceVSAvoidrisk information completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors manufacturing requirements extracted from 3D models, compares them against established manufacturing databases and risk criteria, identifies gaps or conflicts, and provides automated recommendations that feed back into the design specification process, ensuring that manufacturing risks are not omitted and are properly addressed in the final specifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240419847A1Method of Manufacturing Analysis with Ontologies and Semantic Analysis
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 THE BOEING CO
  • US20240419847A1 patent drawing
  • US20240419847A1 patent drawing
  • US20240419847A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Manufacturing analysis is provided. The method comprises identifying a feature of a product model defined by geometric, physical, and systems elements with semantic labels, names or title descriptions. Machine readable semantic links are created that connect the feature to elements in an enterprise knowledge library according to a machine readable ontological knowledge model. A producibility risk or opportunity for the product model is identified according to semantic relationships of the elements in the enterprise knowledge library linked to the feature. A user is alerted of the producibility risk or opportunity, and a note is added to a manufacturing design specification for the product model. The note provides a number of solutions for the producibility risk or opportunity, wherein the solutions are identified in the enterprise knowledge library according to the semantic relationships.