Semantic Message Priority Handling via Flag Bits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication systems fail to effectively prioritize and process multiple semantic messages based on their types, leading to semantic errors and inefficient message handling in semantic communication.

Innovation Solution

A device and method for prioritizing and processing semantic messages by identifying message types through flag bits, configuring RNTI and DCI formats for semantic communication grants, and transmitting these grants with semantic messages or adding type check flag bits to ensure proper processing based on priority.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If semantic messages are handled in FIFO manner without priority setting, then the system is simple to operate, but semantic errors increase and message processing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic communication reliabilityVSAvoidmessage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments semantic messages into different types (e.g., urgent, normal, low priority) and processes each type separately through dedicated queues and handling procedures. This segmentation allows the system to maintain simplicity for each message type while improving overall reliability through type-specific priority handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of message processing from uniform FIFO handling to priority-based handling by introducing priority levels as a new parameter. This allows the system to differentiate between message types and process them accordingly, improving semantic communication reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If priority setting mechanisms are introduced for semantic messages, then message processing efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage processing efficiencyVSAvoidpriority handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by setting priority levels and categorizing semantic messages before they enter the processing queue. This pre-categorization enables efficient processing without requiring complex real-time decision-making, thus improving productivity while controlling device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary priority classification mechanism that sits between message reception and processing. This intermediary layer categorizes messages by type and routes them to appropriate processing queues, improving efficiency while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple semantic message types are processed simultaneously without differentiation, then the system maintains simplicity, but semantic message accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic message interpretation accuracyVSAvoidmessage type differentiation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments semantic messages into distinct types with specific interpretation rules for each type. This segmentation ensures that each message type is interpreted with the appropriate level of precision while maintaining overall system simplicity through clear categorization boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different interpretation accuracy requirements and processing methods to different message types. Each message type receives the appropriate level of scrutiny and processing detail matching its semantic importance, improving overall interpretation accuracy without uniformly increasing complexity across all messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250150428A1Device and method for performing priority setting and processing on basis of semantic message type in semantic communication
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US20250150428A1 patent drawing
  • US20250150428A1 patent drawing
  • US20250150428A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure may provide a device and a method for priority setting and processing of a plurality of semantic messages based on semantic message types in semantic communication. The present disclosure may provide a device and a method for processing a semantic message based on the priority of a received semantic message by first checking flag bits corresponding to the semantic message type and identifying the type of the semantic message that follows the flag bits.