Semantic Region Identification via Density Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current location-based services and map services are inadequate in providing semantic information, as they rely primarily on longitude/latitude coordinates and official administrative names, failing to effectively handle non-official place names and their varying geographical boundaries.

Innovation Solution

A geographical location rendering system and method that utilizes user-generated content for density clustering and data mining to identify semantic regions by extracting common region names and determining their spatial scope, incorporating modules for density clustering, name extraction, and region scope detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current location systems use longitude/latitude coordinates and official administrative names, then location information can be precisely recorded and stored, but the system cannot effectively handle non-official place names and semantic region identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle non-official place namesVSAvoidloss of semantic location information
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between official administrative names and user queries. This layer includes semantic region identification modules that map non-official place names (like 'SoHo') to their corresponding official administrative boundaries, enabling the system to understand and render semantic locations without requiring direct support for every unofficial name variant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying semantic regions and pre-mapping non-official place names to official administrative boundaries. This preparation allows the location system to handle diverse user queries efficiently without requiring real-time analysis of every new place name, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and information preservation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If semantic region boundaries are defined based on cultural and social characteristics, then location information becomes more meaningful and intuitive, but the geographical boundaries become unclear and difficult to define

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitiveness of location informationVSAvoidprecision of geographical boundaries
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different regions to be defined with different boundary characteristics. Semantic regions can have fuzzy boundaries based on cultural characteristics in some areas, while maintaining precise administrative boundaries in others. The system adapts the boundary definition to the local context, making location information more intuitive where needed while maintaining precision where required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts boundary definitions based on the specific semantic region being rendered. For regions with clear cultural boundaries, the system uses well-defined boundaries. For regions with ambiguous boundaries, the system can dynamically adjust the rendering parameters to provide appropriate level of precision, making the system both intuitive and precise as needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the system processes a huge amount of user generated contents for semantic region identification, then location rendering becomes more accurate and comprehensive, but the processing time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of semantic region identificationVSAvoidprocessing time for location analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing by pre-identifying semantic regions and pre-extracting key features from user-generated contents. This pre-processing creates a database of semantic region information that can be quickly queried during actual location rendering operations, significantly reducing the processing time required for each individual location analysis while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the most relevant information from the huge amount of user-generated contents. Instead of processing every detail, the system extracts key semantic features, common place names, and boundary characteristics to create a condensed representation of semantic regions. This extraction approach maintains identification accuracy while dramatically reducing the computational resources and time required for processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9507866B2Geographical location rendering system and method and computer readable recording medium
Publication Date: 2016.11.29 IND TECH RES INST
  • US9507866B2 patent drawing
  • US9507866B2 patent drawing
  • US9507866B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A geographical location rendering method executed in a geographical location rendering system for identifying at least one semantic region is provided. A density clustering is performed on a plurality of user generated contents of respective geographical location name information to generate a plurality of region candidates. A name extraction is performed on the region candidates to extract and confirm a common region name of the region candidates as a name of the semantic region. A region scope of the region candidates is detected as a location scope of the semantic region according to a spatial density analysis.