Semantic Search Engine for User Generated Content

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search engines for user-generated content face challenges in providing meaningful and efficient search results, as they often yield too literal matches, yield single data points, are overwhelmed by excessive reviews, and fail to uncover related information, making it difficult for users to aggregate and contextualize data effectively.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that processes user-generated content by categorizing substrings using dictionaries or pattern analysis, assigning sentiment and influence indicators, and displaying relevant content, enabling a semantic search engine to provide aggregated and contextualized results across multiple domains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional keyword-based search is used, then search speed and simplicity are improved, but search accuracy and meaningful results deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch speedVSAvoidsearch accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the search parameter from simple keyword matching to multi-dimensional semantic analysis. It introduces sentiment scores, influence metrics, and concept categorization as new parameters for evaluating and ranking search results, enabling the system to understand user intent beyond literal keyword matches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer between the user query and the search results. This layer includes sentiment analysis engines, concept extraction modules, and influence calculation systems that mediate between the raw search request and the final results, adding semantic understanding without significantly increasing user-perceived search time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If all individual reviews are displayed, then completeness of information is improved, but user experience and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual reviews into aggregated summaries that preserve essential information while reducing volume. It combines sentiment analysis results, influence metrics, and key theme extraction to create condensed representations that maintain information completeness while improving readability and user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the overwhelming mass of reviews into organized categories based on sentiment, topic, and influence. By dividing reviews into meaningful groups with representative summaries, it allows users to navigate information systematically rather than being overwhelmed by unstructured individual opinions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If semantic processing and categorization are applied, then search accuracy and insight quality are improved, but system complexity and processing time worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary semantic processing and categorization during the content ingestion phase rather than during user queries. By pre-computing sentiment scores, influence metrics, and concept categorizations for all user-generated content, it reduces the complexity of real-time search processing while maintaining high search accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of information

If comprehensive analysis of all content is performed, then discovery of relevant information is improved, but processing time and computational resources worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation discoveryVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial analysis by focusing computational resources on the most influential and relevant content based on pre-calculated influence metrics. Rather than uniformly analyzing all content, it prioritizes high-influence reviews and uses sampling strategies for less critical content, achieving comprehensive information discovery with reduced processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9235646B2Method and system for a search engine for user generated content (UGC)
Publication Date: 2016.01.12 TIP TOP TECH
  • US9235646B2 patent drawing
  • US9235646B2 patent drawing
  • US9235646B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for a search engine for user generated content have been disclosed. According to one embodiment, a computer implemented method comprises receiving a search request from a client, the search request directed to user generated content. Relevant user generated content is retrieved, wherein retrieving comprises searching processed user generated content, and wherein processing user generated content comprises receiving first input data including text, creating a substring of text from the first input data and categorizing the substring to produce a concept associated with the substring, wherein the substring is categorized according to one of dictionaries or pattern analysis. An indication of sentiment is assigned to the concept associated with the substring and an indication of influence is assigned to the concept associated with the substring. The relevant user generated content is displayed.