Semantic Search System Using Entity Pair Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search technologies face challenges in providing accurate and contextually relevant results from large datasets, often producing false positives and missing relevant documents due to their reliance on keyword-based similarity scores without considering context.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and methods that parse document texts into sentences, identify named entities, pair entities, and assess similarity based on semantic pairs, enabling the visualization of document relationships and distinguishing original from derived content, using techniques like Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) and graphical displays to indicate content overlap and borrowing directions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If keyword-based similarity scores are used for document retrieval, then search speed is improved, but search accuracy deteriorates due to false positives and missed relevant documents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch speedVSAvoidsearch accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments documents into sentences and sentences into semantic pairs of named entities, enabling fine-grained analysis of meaning relationships. This segmentation allows the system to retrieve documents based on semantic pair matches rather than keyword frequency, improving accuracy while maintaining speed through efficient indexing of segmented units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the retrieval parameter from keyword-based similarity scores to semantic pair-based similarity scores. By transforming the basis of similarity measurement from surface-level keywords to contextual semantic pairs, the system achieves both speed and accuracy improvements through more meaningful document matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If general document-similarity scores are used to fetch more documents like a query, then quantity of results is improved, but relevance quality deteriorates due to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of resultsVSAvoidrelevance quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by matching specific semantic pairs (local meaning units) rather than relying on general document similarity. Each semantic pair represents a localized concept relationship, allowing the system to retrieve documents with high relevance quality by matching specific local meanings while maintaining adequate quantity through comprehensive semantic indexing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If semantic pair-based similarity scoring is implemented, then search accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing documents into sentences and semantic pairs before retrieval operations. This preliminary segmentation and indexing of semantic pairs simplifies the actual retrieval process, as the system can directly query semantic pair matches rather than performing complex analysis during search, thus reducing processing complexity while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If content overlap metrics are calculated between documents, then plagiarism detection accuracy is improved, but computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplagiarism detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments document content into semantic pairs, enabling plagiarism detection through comparison of these discrete semantic units. This segmentation allows efficient computation of content overlap metrics by counting and comparing semantic pair frequencies rather than processing entire documents, improving detection accuracy while reducing computation time through the modular nature of semantic pair comparisons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9489350B2Systems and methods for semantic search, content correlation and visualization
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 CONTIEM INC
  • US9489350B2 patent drawing
  • US9489350B2 patent drawing
  • US9489350B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for searching over large (i.e., Internet scale) data to discover relevant information artifacts based on similar content and/or relationships are disclosed. Improvements over simple keyword and phrase based searching over internet scale data are shown. Search engines providing accurate and contextually relevant search results are disclosed. Users are enabled to identify related documents and information artifacts and quickly, ascertain, via visualization, which of these documents are original, which are derived (or copied) from a source document or information artifact, and which subset is independently generated (i.e., an original document or information artifact).