Semantic Segmentation Rendering UAV Structure Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D scan approaches for structure inspection using UAVs are limited by high-fidelity processing requirements, generating large amounts of data and focusing only on geometric information, which does not allow for precise localization or identification of specific structure components, requiring manual and labor-intensive processes for component differentiation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing semantic segmentation rendering that encodes structural data in pixel values, enabling precise localization of structure components by associating identifiers with each pixel, and using shaders to visually distinguish components in 3D graphical representations, allowing for automated identification and storage of component locations for further inspections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high-fidelity 3D scanning is used for structure inspection, then geometric information accuracy is improved, but data volume and processing complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric information accuracyVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential geometric information needed for inspection from the captured images, rather than processing all high-fidelity 3D scan data. This is achieved by identifying and extracting key structural features and components, converting them into simplified 3D representations that retain inspection-relevant information while eliminating redundant data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of starting with high-fidelity 3D scanning and then filtering data, the patent inverts the approach by first capturing images, extracting essential geometric information, and only then generating 3D representations. This reversal allows the system to obtain sufficient geometric accuracy for inspection purposes without the overhead of processing complete high-fidelity scans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If high-fidelity 3D scanning is used for structure inspection, then geometric information accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric information accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential geometric information needed for inspection from the captured images, rather than processing all high-fidelity 3D scan data. This is achieved by identifying and extracting key structural features and components, converting them into simplified 3D representations that retain inspection-relevant information while eliminating redundant data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing only the portions of the structure that are relevant to the inspection objectives. Instead of performing complete high-fidelity scanning and processing of entire structures, the system selectively processes specific components and features that require inspection, reducing overall processing time and computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual processes are used for component differentiation, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but labor intensity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the inspection system to automatically identify, differentiate, and process structural components without manual intervention. The system uses image processing and pattern recognition to autonomously distinguish between different structure components, automatically generate 3D representations, and prepare inspection data, thereby eliminating the need for manual component differentiation while maintaining adaptability to various structure types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes with automated computational methods. Instead of human operators manually differentiating and recording component information, the system uses computer vision algorithms, image processing techniques, and automated 3D reconstruction methods to perform these tasks, significantly improving productivity while maintaining the flexibility to handle diverse structure types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If comprehensive data capture is performed for all structure components, then inspection completeness is improved, but data storage requirements and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection completenessVSAvoiddata storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential geometric information needed for inspection from the captured images, rather than processing all high-fidelity 3D scan data. This is achieved by identifying and extracting key structural features and components, converting them into simplified 3D representations that retain inspection-relevant information while eliminating redundant data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the structure into distinct components and processes each component separately, capturing only the data necessary for inspecting each specific element. This segmentation approach allows the system to maintain inspection completeness by ensuring all necessary components are covered, while reducing overall data storage requirements by avoiding redundant capture of entire structures at maximum fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250095156A1Semantic Segmentation Rendering For Precise Localization Of Structure Components On Captured Images
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 SKYDIO INC
  • US20250095156A1 patent drawing
  • US20250095156A1 patent drawing
  • US20250095156A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Semantic segmentation rendering is performed to encode structural data, including precise and relative component locations, in pixel values of an image depicting a structure. Images captured during a UAV-based exploration inspection of a structure are obtained. In each pixel value that corresponds to the structure within the images, identifiers of the structure, a component of the structure depicted using the pixel value, and a location of the component are encoded. The pixel values of the images are segmented into polygons according to the encoded identifiers, and data indicative of the polygons is stored for use in a further inspection of the structure. In connection with the semantic segmentation rendering, a three-dimensional graphical representation of the structure is obtained and rendered, according to the encoded identifiers, using shaders that visually distinguish each component of the structure, in which the data indicative of the polygons identifies respective ones of the shaders.