Semantic Segmentation for Vehicle Damage Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assessing damage to physical structures, such as vehicles, are laborious, time-consuming, and prone to errors, especially when relying on manual image evaluation or limited AI/ML systems that struggle with identifying damaged parts at a high level of granularity.

Innovation Solution

The development of AI/ML systems trained using auto-labeled datasets and enhanced with techniques like synthetic image generation and hierarchical analysis, allowing for accurate identification and segmentation of vehicle parts, including damaged ones, at a high level of granularity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual image evaluation is used to assess damage, then detailed analysis can be performed, but the process becomes laborious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated AI/ML-based image analysis system. The system uses trained neural networks to automatically evaluate damage in images, substituting human inspectors with computational algorithms that can process images rapidly while maintaining detailed analysis capabilities through semantic segmentation and parts identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The AI/ML system performs self-service by automatically assessing damage without requiring human intervention. The trained models independently analyze images, identify damaged parts, and generate assessments, enabling the system to serve itself in the inspection process while eliminating the need for manual evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual image evaluation is used, then detailed damage analysis is possible, but the process is prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage analysis accuracyVSAvoidanalysis consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human manual evaluation with automated AI/ML systems that eliminate human error and inconsistency. The trained neural networks provide reliable, repeatable assessments by consistently applying the same analytical criteria to all images, removing variability introduced by different human inspectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the AI/ML models are trained on labeled datasets and continuously improve their accuracy. The system provides feedback through confidence scores and can be retrained with new data, ensuring consistent and reliable analysis while allowing for continuous improvement of assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If existing AI/ML systems are used for damage assessment, then automation is achieved, but accuracy in identifying damaged parts at high granularity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment automationVSAvoidparts identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the image analysis into distinct semantic parts and components. The system segments images to identify specific vehicle parts (hood, door, bumper, etc.) and further segments damaged regions within each part, enabling high-granularity identification of damaged areas while maintaining full automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds dimensional depth to automated analysis by implementing hierarchical segmentation that operates at multiple levels: whole vehicle, individual parts, and specific damaged regions. This multi-dimensional approach enables precise identification of damaged parts while maintaining automation, moving beyond simple binary damage detection to detailed parts-level analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If extensive manual labeling is performed to train AI/ML systems, then training data quality improves, but the process becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data qualityVSAvoiddata labeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by using auto-labeling to pre-process and generate initial training data before final model training. This preliminary automatic labeling reduces the need for extensive manual labeling, as the system creates a substantial portion of training data automatically, which can then be refined with minimal manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The AI/ML system performs self-service in data preparation by automatically generating labels for training data. The system uses pre-trained models to auto-label images, creating training datasets without requiring extensive manual annotation, thereby maintaining high training data quality while eliminating the time-consuming manual labeling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12271442B2Semantic image segmentation for cognitive analysis of physical structures
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 GENPACT USA INC
  • US12271442B2 patent drawing
  • US12271442B2 patent drawing
  • US12271442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and computing apparatus are provided for training AI/ML systems and use of such systems for performing image analysis so that the damaged parts of a physical structure can be identified accurately and efficiently. According to one embodiment, a method includes selecting an AI/ML system of a particular type; and training the AI/ML system using a dataset comprising one or more auto-labeled images. The auto-labeling was performed using the selected AI/ML system configured using a parts-identification model. The configuration of the trained AI/ML system is output as an improved parts-identification model.