Production Planning Using Semantic Task-Capability Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current production planning methods are inflexible and time-consuming, particularly for new product introductions, as they require manual planning for each manufacturing installation, leading to long market introduction times and lack of flexibility, which is inadequate for market trends like manufacture to order or manufacturing services.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for production planning that compares task descriptions from a work plan with manufacturing capabilities of various devices, allowing for situation-dependent planning by matching tasks with device capabilities, using semantic and multiattributive comparisons to bridge the granularity gap between abstract task descriptions and machine capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual production planning is performed for each manufacturing installation, then the manufacturing process can be precisely adapted to available equipment, but the market introduction time becomes long and flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process adaptationVSAvoidmarket introduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining manufacturing capabilities of devices in a standardized format before production planning occurs. The capability descriptions are prepared in advance, allowing automated matching with work plan tasks without manual intervention during actual planning, thus reducing market introduction time while maintaining adaptation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer - the standardized capability description format - that bridges between the work plan tasks and the actual manufacturing devices. This intermediary enables automated comparison and matching, eliminating the need for manual planning while ensuring precise adaptation to available equipment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If central planning logic matches task descriptions with machine capability descriptions, then production planning can be automated, but complex machines cannot have their capabilities expressed completely in declarative form

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction planning automationVSAvoidmachine capability description completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing machine capabilities into hierarchical levels: general capabilities that can be described declaratively, and specific capabilities that require demonstration. This segmentation allows automated planning for general tasks while preserving detailed capability information for complex machines through the instruction mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using declarative capability descriptions for tasks where they are sufficient, and resorting to demonstration instructions only when necessary. This partial use of automated matching with supplemental demonstration ensures automation where possible while maintaining complete capability expression for complex scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If decentralized approaches with intelligent machines are used, then production planning flexibility is improved, but additional communication complexity and coordination functions are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction planning flexibilityVSAvoidcommunication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges central and decentralized approaches by having the production control system perform initial automated matching using standardized capability descriptions, then allowing individual devices to demonstrate specific capabilities if needed. This combination reduces communication complexity compared to fully decentralized approaches while maintaining flexibility through device-level demonstration capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11593736B2Method for production planning
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 SIEMENS AG
  • US11593736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a production planning method using a plurality of manufacturing devices (INTMA) according to which tasks (TD) of a work plan (BOP) are compared (MA) with manufacturing capabilities (SD) of the manufacturing devices (INTMA) and, depending on the one or more results (MAQ) of said comparison (MA), at least one or more manufacturing devices (INTMA) are commissioned to match their manufacturing capabilities (SD) with the task(s) (TD).