Semantic Vector Analysis for Automated Candidate Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The hiring industry faces challenges in efficiently evaluating job candidates due to large candidate pools, subjective industry terms, inadequate domain knowledge, and biased hiring practices, leading to costly 'bad hires' and inefficient recruitment processes.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system using semantic representation of text in a natural language knowledgebase to generate dynamic definitions of job titles and industry terms, enabling automated candidate evaluation without human interaction, and reducing labor costs by simplifying the role of human operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated systems use keyword-based sorting and filtering to evaluate candidates, then evaluation speed increases, but evaluation accuracy deteriorates due to narrow quantitative assessment and inability to understand contextual meaning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidevaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional keyword-based mechanical filtering systems with a semantic analysis system that uses concept vectors and similarity algorithms to understand the meaning and context of candidate qualifications, enabling both speed and accuracy in evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the evaluation parameters from simple keyword matching to multi-dimensional concept vector comparisons, allowing for nuanced assessment of candidate qualifications while maintaining automated processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If manual evaluation by HR employees is used to assess candidate skills and qualifications, then evaluation accuracy improves through domain knowledge, but labor costs and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-evaluation of candidates by comparing candidate profiles against job requirements using semantic analysis, eliminating the need for manual HR review while maintaining assessment quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary semantic analysis layer that translates both job requirements and candidate qualifications into concept vectors, enabling automated comparison that captures the nuance of domain knowledge without requiring manual expert review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If standardized industry terms are used to define job titles and skills, then communication clarity improves, but adaptability to diverse candidate expressions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication clarityVSAvoidcandidate expression flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal concept vector representation that can map diverse candidate expressions to standardized job requirements, enabling both clear communication and flexible adaptation to various ways candidates describe their qualifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If human operators review all candidate options to make informed hiring decisions, then hiring quality improves, but time consumption and resource costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehiring qualityVSAvoidrecruitment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary semantic analysis and ranking of candidates before human review, pre-processing the candidate pool to identify the most qualified applicants based on conceptual similarity to job requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies automated semantic evaluation to the entire candidate pool to generate rankings, then uses partial human review focused only on the top-ranked candidates, combining automated efficiency with targeted human judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11899674B2Systems and methods to determine and utilize conceptual relatedness between natural language sources
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 VETTD INC
  • US11899674B2 patent drawing
  • US11899674B2 patent drawing
  • US11899674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microprocessor executable method and system for determining the semantic relatedness and meaning between at least two natural language sources is described in a prescribed context. Portions of natural languages are vectorized and mathematically processed to express relatedness as a calculated metric. The metric is associable to the natural language sources to graphically present the level of relatedness between at least two natural language sources. The metric may be re-determined with algorithms designed to compare the natural language sources with a knowledge data bank so the calculated metric can be ascertained with a higher level of certainty.