Sememe Prediction Using Dictionary Definitions and Negative Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sememe prediction methods using word embeddings fail to provide accurate predictions for low-frequency words and are sensitive to embedding quality, making it difficult to learn embeddings for new words.

Innovation Solution

A novel sememe prediction method that leverages online word dictionaries, employing multi-label text classification and a negative sampling strategy to improve the robustness of the prediction model by capturing semantic relevance between a word's definition and sememes, using a text matching model and two negative sampling methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If word embeddings are used for sememe prediction, then the method is simple and straightforward, but prediction accuracy deteriorates for low-frequency words and the method becomes sensitive to embedding quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod simplicityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (dictionary-based semantic representation) between the input word and the sememe prediction. Instead of directly using word embeddings, the system first retrieves dictionary definitions and semantic information as an intermediate representation, which then feeds into the prediction model. This intermediary layer provides richer semantic context and reduces sensitivity to embedding quality, particularly for low-frequency words.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple information sources (word embeddings, dictionary definitions, semantic relationships) into a composite representation for sememe prediction. Rather than relying solely on word embeddings, the system integrates multiple types of linguistic information, creating a more robust and accurate prediction framework that leverages the strengths of each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If word embeddings are fixed after training, then the system is stable, but it becomes difficult to learn embeddings for new words

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidability to handle new words
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-loading comprehensive dictionary data and semantic information before the prediction process. This preliminary preparation creates a rich knowledge base that can immediately support new words without requiring retraining of embedding models. The system is pre-equipped with linguistic knowledge that can be applied adaptively to novel inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables new words to serve themselves by leveraging the pre-loaded dictionary and semantic resources. When a new word is encountered, the system automatically retrieves relevant semantic information from the dictionary without requiring external retraining or manual intervention. This self-service mechanism allows the system to adapt to new words while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If all incorrect sememes are treated as negative labels, then comprehensive training is achieved, but training time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining completenessVSAvoidtraining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses on the most informative negative samples rather than using all incorrect sememes. By selecting a subset of critical negative examples (those most likely to be confused with positive sememes), the system achieves effective training without the computational burden of processing every possible negative label. This extraction approach maintains training reliability while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using a strategically selected portion of negative samples rather than the complete set. Instead of exhaustively training on all incorrect sememes, the system uses a carefully chosen subset that provides sufficient training signal. This partial approach achieves comparable or superior training effectiveness with reduced computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11610060B2Automatic lexical sememe prediction system using lexical dictionaries
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 TENCENT AMERICA LLC
  • US11610060B2 patent drawing
  • US11610060B2 patent drawing
  • US11610060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and apparatus for automatically predicting lexical sememes using a lexical dictionary, comprising inputting a word, retrieving the word's semantic definition and sememes corresponding to the word from an online dictionary, setting each of the retrieved sememes as a candidate sememe, inputting the word's semantic definition and candidate sememe, and estimating the probability that the candidate sememe can be inferred from the word's semantic definition.