Semi-Automated Bulk Sorting System with Automated Diverter Arms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distribution centers face challenges in efficiently sorting a variety of parcel types, including cartons, polybags, and mailers, while meeting carrier preferences, which increases costs and requires a more efficient and cost-effective solution.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automated bulk sorting system with a primary conveyor, sorting stations, infeed chutes, automated diverter arms, and takeaway chutes that allow for efficient sorting and accumulation of parcels, accommodating diverse packaging types and adjusting to varying supply flows by activating or deactivating diverter arms based on demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated sorting systems are used to increase sorting speed and efficiency, then productivity increases, but device complexity and capital investment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sorting system is divided into multiple independent sorting stations (first sorting station, second sorting station, etc.) that can operate semi-independently. Each station has its own sorting platform and can handle specific parcel types, allowing the system to process diverse packages efficiently while maintaining modular complexity that can be scaled based on needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sorting platforms are designed to handle multiple types of parcels (cartons, polybags, mailers) across different sorting stations. The system can be configured to sort various carrier preferences and package types using the same basic platform structure, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sorting stations are added to handle diverse package types, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling diversity of packagingVSAvoidnumber of sorting stations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments sorting operations into specialized stations (first sorting station for certain package types, second sorting station for others) that feed into a common primary conveyor. This segmentation allows each station to be optimized for specific package types while sharing common infrastructure, improving adaptability without proportionally increasing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sorting stations are merged into a unified system with a shared primary conveyor and common control architecture. The sorting platforms from different stations all feed into the same primary conveyor stream, allowing the system to handle diverse packaging types while consolidating control and reducing redundant infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Speed

If infeed chutes are positioned with a steeper slope to increase flow speed, then speed improves, but reliability of controlled accumulation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow speed of parcelsVSAvoidcontrolled accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The infeed chutes are positioned at an optimized angle that balances flow speed and controlled accumulation. The chute design incorporates dynamic elements that allow parcels to maintain sufficient speed for efficient sorting while enabling reliable accumulation and controlled release onto the sorting platforms, ensuring consistent operation across varying loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system increases sorting efficiency to 18,000 packages per hour, reduces labor costs, and allows for modular configuration to manage throughput surges, minimizing capital investment and enabling flexible resource allocation to meet customer expectations.

Implementation Method 1

The infeed chutes may be positioned with an approximately nineteen (19) degree slope from the primary conveyor towards the plurality of sorting platforms

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS12053802B2Semi-automated bulk sorting system and associated methods
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 DESIGNED CONVEYOR SYST LLC
  • US12053802B2 patent drawing
  • US12053802B2 patent drawing
  • US12053802B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semi-automated bulk sorting system includes a primary conveyor having a proximal end and a distal end, and a plurality of sorting stations downstream from the primary conveyor and configured to sort the outbound parcels and cartons, where each of the sorting stations has a sorting platform. The system also includes a plurality of infeed chutes coupled between the primary conveyor and the plurality of sorting stations, and a plurality of automated diverter arms configured to automatically divert the outbound parcels and cartons from the primary conveyor down one of the plurality of infeed chutes to a respective sorting platform of the plurality of sorting stations. The sorting platform of each of the sorting stations is configured to cause the outbound parcels and cartons to accumulate on the plurality of infeed chutes.