Semi-autonomous Route Compliance Navigation System
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current navigation systems lack the ability to autonomously detect deviations from a prescribed route and guide a vehicle or object back to the route according to predefined strictness criteria without real-time communication with a controlling authority, especially in scenarios where strict adherence is necessary due to security, safety, or operational requirements.
Innovation Solution
A system and method that allow a controlling authority to predetermine strictness criteria for staying on and returning to a route, enabling the vehicle or object to operate semi-autonomously by detecting deviations and following predefined return-to-route criteria, with communication of these criteria prior to travel, allowing the vehicle or object to make necessary adjustments without continuous communication with the authority.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a vehicle operates completely autonomously with automatic route recalculation, then route adaptability is improved, but route compliance control deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system pre-establishes strictness criteria and return-to-route rules before the vehicle departs. The controlling authority configures parameters such as maximum deviation distance, time thresholds, and authorized deviation reasons in advance, allowing the vehicle to operate autonomously within predefined boundaries while maintaining compliance control.
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically adjusts navigation behavior based on the vehicle's compliance status. When the vehicle is on-route, it follows strict guidance; when it deviates within authorized limits, it transitions to a more flexible mode allowing autonomous decision-making. The system adapts its control strictness in real-time based on the situation.
2Reliability
If continuous communication with controlling authority is maintained, then route compliance control is improved, but communication infrastructure requirements worsen
Solution Approach 1:
The system transmits all necessary routing instructions, strictness criteria, and operational parameters to the vehicle before departure. This preliminary communication eliminates the need for continuous real-time communication during transit, reducing infrastructure requirements while maintaining compliance control through pre-configured autonomous decision-making rules.
3Reliability
If strict route adherence is enforced, then security and safety are improved, but operational flexibility deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The navigation system dynamically adjusts its strictness based on the vehicle's operational context. For authorized deviation reasons such as fuel stops, restroom breaks, or emergency situations, the system transitions from strict route enforcement to a more flexible mode that allows temporary deviations while still maintaining overall route compliance and security.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes operational parameters based on the situation. When a vehicle requests or is authorized to deviate, parameters such as maximum allowed distance from route, time thresholds for return, and acceptable deviation reasons are adjusted. This allows strict security enforcement for normal operations while providing operational flexibility when needed.
4Reliability
If real-time communication with controlling authority is required for route deviations, then route compliance control is improved, but time efficiency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system pre-configures autonomous decision-making authority for the vehicle operator within defined strictness criteria. For routine deviations such as authorized stops or minor route adjustments, the vehicle can make decisions independently without contacting the controlling authority, eliminating communication delays while maintaining compliance for significant deviations.
Data Source
AI summary
A method and system for detecting that an object, person or vehicle has deviated in space or time from its prescribed route, and guiding it back to the prescribed route, according to strictness criteria predefined by a controlling authority or authorities. The invention allows controlling authorities to pre-specify a level of strictness suiting the object, person or vehicle and purpose of travel, by which the object, person or vehicle is guided back to the prescribed route autonomously, enabling return to route according to established policies, without the necessity of further communication with controlling authorities. The method and system thus operate semi-autonomously, with strictness parameters predefined by the central authorities, and the object, person or vehicle operating with some degree of latitude within those strictness parameters.