Semi-Coherent Transceiver Array Clock Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The distribution of clock signals in coherent transceiver systems becomes cumbersome, error-prone, and costly as the number of transceivers increases, particularly in distributed antenna systems, affecting beam pointing and null steering accuracy.

Innovation Solution

The use of semi-coherent transceivers, where each transceiver has integrated local oscillators and ADC/DAC circuits, driven by a single clock source, controlling phase, amplitude, and frequency errors within a defined error band, allowing for spatially separated subarrays and reducing the need for a fully coherent architecture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a fully coherent transceiver architecture is used to maintain beam pointing and null steering accuracy, then phase and amplitude stability is improved, but system complexity and cost increase due to distributed clock and local oscillator distribution networks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam pointing accuracyVSAvoidclock distribution network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the transceiver system into independent semi-coherent units, each with its own local oscillator, eliminating the need for a centralized coherent distribution network. Each transceiver operates independently within an error band, segmenting the previously unified coherent system into manageable autonomous modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent accepts a controlled level of phase instability (error band) in each transceiver's local oscillator, effectively tolerating a certain degree of imperfection rather than requiring expensive perfect coherence. This trade-off reduces system cost while maintaining adequate performance through adaptive processing algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Productivity

If the number of transceivers is increased to improve system performance, then array processing capability is improved, but the clock distribution network becomes more error-prone and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearray processing capabilityVSAvoidclock distribution reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into independent transceivers with local oscillators, the patent eliminates the single point of failure in centralized clock distribution. Each transceiver becomes an independent unit that can operate autonomously, improving overall system reliability as scale increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each transceiver generates and maintains its own clock and local oscillator signals, making the system self-sufficient at the transceiver level. This eliminates dependence on external distribution networks and reduces vulnerability to distribution-related failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If integrated local oscillators are used in each transceiver to reduce system complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but phase coherence between transceivers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransceiver architecture complexityVSAvoidphase coherence
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the coherence parameter from perfect (fully coherent) to controlled imperfection (semi-coherent within error band). This parameter change is compensated by adaptive array processing algorithms that can operate effectively with the relaxed coherence requirements, achieving the desired balance between complexity and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses adaptive processing algorithms that provide feedback to compensate for phase variations between transceivers. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain effective array processing performance despite the reduced phase coherence from using independent local oscillators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11552669B2Precision array processing using semi-coherent transceivers
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 TARANA WIRELESS
  • US11552669B2 patent drawing
  • US11552669B2 patent drawing
  • US11552669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for precision array processing using semi-coherent transceivers are disclosed.