Semi-Constrained Spinal Anchoring System for Natural Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical methods for correcting spinal deformities often require multiple attachment anchors and rigid hardware, which can limit natural motion and growth of the spinal column.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a substantially rigid rod with adjustable anchors that allow axial translation and changes in pitch and yaw, minimizing the number of attachment anchors and promoting natural spinal motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple attachment anchors and rigid hardware are used to correct spinal deformities, then the stability and correction effectiveness are improved, but the limitation of natural motion and growth of the spinal column worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection effectivenessVSAvoidnatural motion and growth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The rod anchor system transitions from rigid fixed anchors to dynamic anchors that permit controlled motion. The rod is configured to allow translation and rotation relative to the vertebral bodies, enabling the system to adapt to natural spinal motion and growth while maintaining correction effectiveness through controlled constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the mechanical parameters of the anchor-rod interface by introducing controlled degrees of freedom. The rod anchors are designed with specific geometric features that allow translation along the rod axis and rotation about it, fundamentally changing from a rigid fixed parameter to a dynamic controlled motion parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If multiple attachment anchors are used for spinal correction, then the structural stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidnumber of attachment anchors
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential stabilizing function from multiple complex attachment anchors and concentrates it into a simplified rod-anchor system. By removing unnecessary anchors and hardware components, the system achieves structural stability through the engineered motion-permitting characteristics of fewer, more sophisticated anchor-rod interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If rigid hardware systems are used to stabilize the spinal column, then the fusion facilitation is improved, but the limitation of spinal column movement worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion facilitationVSAvoidspinal column movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The hardware system transitions from static rigid stabilization to dynamic controlled stabilization. The rod and anchor configuration provides sufficient stability to facilitate fusion while simultaneously permitting natural spinal movement through controlled degrees of freedom, eliminating the need for completely rigid fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250032153A1Semi-Constrained Anchoring System
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 VB SPINE LLC
  • US20250032153A1 patent drawing
  • US20250032153A1 patent drawing
  • US20250032153A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices, and associated methods for correcting spinal column deformities that help minimize a number of attachment anchors utilized for correction, facilitate use of straight or contoured rods, and/or help promote a more natural, physiologic motion of the spinal column.