Semi-open Centrifugal Pump Impeller Blade Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semi-open centrifugal pumps face issues of low efficiency, significant energy loss at the inlet, inlet cavitation, leak at the front cover, separation of boundary layers at the blade inlets, narrow lift range of the dead point, and excessive noise due to suboptimal design parameters such as blade arrangement, angle, thickness, and hub configuration.

Innovation Solution

The design optimizes the semi-open centrifugal pump impeller by reducing the number of long blades and adding medium and short length splitter blades with varying circumferential distances, adjusting blade angles and thickness, and chamfering the hub and pressure surface to improve efficiency and reduce cavitation, while maintaining the outer diameter and shaft cross-section area unchanged.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of long blades is reduced and medium and short length splitter blades are added, then pump efficiency is improved and lift range is increased, but device complexity increases due to multiple blade length configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump efficiencyVSAvoidblade arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller blades are segmented into three distinct length categories: long blades, medium-length splitter blades, and short splitter blades. This segmentation allows different blade lengths to be strategically positioned to optimize fluid flow patterns, reduce cavitation, and improve pump efficiency while managing the complexity through systematic arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different blade lengths are assigned to specific circumferential positions on the impeller. The long blades are positioned at certain angles while medium and short splitter blades are placed at other angles, creating local variations in blade geometry that optimize performance at different locations around the impeller circumference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If blade angles and thickness are optimized, then energy loss is reduced and efficiency is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinlet energy lossVSAvoidblade angle and thickness precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention specifies optimized parameter ranges for blade angles (αZ2, αb2) and thickness dimensions (dj2, dc2) rather than single fixed values. This approach allows manufacturing within acceptable tolerances while still achieving the desired reduction in energy loss and improvement in efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization focuses on the most critical parameters (blade angles and thickness at inlet and outlet) that have the greatest impact on energy loss, rather than attempting to optimize all geometric parameters equally. This partial optimization approach achieves significant energy loss reduction while keeping manufacturing precision requirements manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If hub fillet and pressure surface fillet are added, then cavitation is reduced and flow is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecavitationVSAvoidimpeller geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Fillet features with specific radii (R1 for hub fillet, R2 for pressure surface fillet) are added to the impeller geometry. These curved transitions eliminate sharp corners that would cause flow separation and cavitation, smoothing the fluid flow paths and reducing harmful cavitation effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The fillet features convert potential harmful sharp edges and corners into beneficial smooth transitions. By rounding the hub inlet and pressure surface outlet, the design transforms what would be cavitation-prone sharp geometries into flow-smoothing features that actually improve performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimization enhances pump efficiency by 3.8%, increases the maximum lift by 13.2%, and improves the maximum flow by 14.3%, effectively addressing the limitations of the original design by reducing cavitation and energy loss.

Implementation Method 1

A centrifugal pump is viewed as a generic type of machinery, the primary function of which is to convert original mechanical energy into the energy carried by fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS11525454B2Semi-open centrifugal pump impeller and its optimization design
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 JIANGSU UNIV
  • US11525454B2 patent drawing
  • US11525454B2 patent drawing
  • US11525454B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for optimizing the design of a semi-open centrifugal pump impeller involves the steps of, reducing the number of long blades and adding a medium length splitter blade and a short length splitter blade having varying circumferential distances between any two optimized long blades. Each medium length and short length splitter blade have the same outlet position, profile and thickness as the optimized long blade; however, the medium length and short length splitter blades have different inlet positions relative to the optimized long blade. The long blade, medium length splitter blade and short length splitter blade are arranged in circumferential sequence along the direction of rotation of the impeller. This optimization improves various problems arising from the original semi-open centrifugal pumps, including low efficiency, significant loss at the inlet, inlet cavitation, separation of boundary layers at the blade inlets, narrow lift range of the dead point and excessive noise.