Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection Framework for Purpose-Oriented Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine learning-based anomaly detection systems face challenges with concept drift, leading to false positives, and lack purpose-oriented functionality, resulting in irrelevant anomaly identification.

Innovation Solution

A semi-supervised anomaly detection framework that integrates manual grading to train a supervised classification model on top of an unsupervised anomaly detection model, addressing concept drift and improving relevance by calculating statistical uncertainty and selecting graded samples effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If unsupervised anomaly detection models are used to detect anomalies, then the system can identify statistical outliers, but the system produces false positives due to concept drift and lacks purpose-oriented functionality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positives
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A semi-supervised classification model is introduced as an intermediary component between the unsupervised anomaly detection model and the final anomaly reporting. This intermediary model processes the anomaly scores from the unsupervised model and applies purpose-oriented classification to filter out false positives, thereby improving reliability while reducing harmful false positive outputs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Manual grading of anomalies is implemented as a feedback mechanism where human experts review and label anomaly samples. This feedback is used to continuously train and refine the semi-supervised classification model, enabling the system to learn from actual anomaly patterns and reduce false positives over time while maintaining purpose-oriented detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual grading is used to train supervised models, then purpose-oriented anomaly identification is achieved, but the process is time-consuming and requires significant human effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurpose-oriented detection accuracyVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring complete manual grading of all anomaly samples, the system uses partial action by selectively grading only a subset of samples. The semi-supervised classification model leverages this partial labeled data to achieve purpose-oriented detection, significantly reducing the time and human effort required compared to full manual grading while maintaining detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The unsupervised anomaly detection model performs preliminary action by automatically identifying potential anomaly samples and generating anomaly scores before human grading is applied. This preliminary processing filters and prioritizes samples for manual grading, reducing the overall time required by focusing human effort only on the most suspicious cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the unsupervised model is retrained frequently to address concept drift, then adaptation to changing data distributions is improved, but system complexity and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcept drift adaptationVSAvoidmodel retraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the adaptation process into two independent components: the unsupervised anomaly detection model that handles statistical outlier detection, and the semi-supervised classification model that handles purpose-oriented filtering. This segmentation allows each model to be trained independently on different data types, reducing the complexity and disruption of retraining the entire system when concept drift occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12143408B2Semi-supervised framework for purpose-oriented anomaly detection
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US12143408B2 patent drawing
  • US12143408B2 patent drawing
  • US12143408B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for implementing a semi-supervised framework for purpose-oriented anomaly detection are provided. In one technique, a data item in inputted into an unsupervised anomaly detection model, which generates first output. Based on the first output, it is determined whether the data item represents an anomaly. In response to determining that the data item represents an anomaly, the data item is inputted into a supervised classification model, which generates second output that indicates whether the data item is unknown. In response to determining that the data item is unknown, a training instance is generated based on the data item. The supervised classification model is updated based on the training instance.