Semi-supervised landmark labeling with shape constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual landmark labeling for images is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to errors, especially in tasks requiring thousands of labeled images for object detection, and unsupervised learning methods struggle to accurately locate meaningful features like mouth or eye corners.

Innovation Solution

A semi-supervised least squares congealing method that automatically propagates landmark points from a small set of manually labeled images to a large set, using hierarchical patch-based estimation and shape constraints to improve accuracy and reduce outliers, enabling accurate landmark labeling with minimal labeled data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual landmark labeling is performed, then labeling accuracy and reliability are improved, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses semi-supervised learning to copy landmark annotations from a small set of manually labeled images to a large set of automatically labeled images. The system propagates landmark information through a propagation mechanism that leverages geometric relationships and shape constraints, allowing accurate landmark detection without manual annotation of every image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary manual labeling on a small subset of images (1-3%) to establish initial landmark annotations. These preliminary labels serve as seeds for the automatic propagation process, enabling the system to automatically annotate the remaining images by leveraging the preliminary annotations and geometric constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If unsupervised learning methods are used for landmark detection, then labeling speed increases, but accuracy in locating meaningful features deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling speedVSAvoidfeature location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms through iterative optimization processes that refine landmark estimates. The system uses shape constraints and geometric relationships to continuously adjust and improve landmark positions, ensuring that automatically detected landmarks converge toward accurate feature locations through feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by transitioning from unsupervised methods to semi-supervised methods that incorporate both labeled and unlabeled data. The system adjusts the balance between manual and automatic labeling by varying the proportion of manually labeled images, achieving optimal performance by leveraging both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of images are manually labeled, then model generalization capability is improved, but cost and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel generalization capabilityVSAvoidnumber of labeled images
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by manually labeling only a small subset (1-3%) of images rather than the entire dataset. The system then uses propagation mechanisms to extend these partial labels to cover the full dataset, achieving sufficient generalization capability without the cost of complete manual labeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components including shape constraints, geometric relationships, and propagation algorithms that mediate between the small set of manually labeled images and the large set of automatically labeled images. These intermediaries enable the transfer of landmark information while maintaining accuracy and generalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8897550B2System and method for automatic landmark labeling with minimal supervision
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA LLC
  • US8897550B2 patent drawing
  • US8897550B2 patent drawing
  • US8897550B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for estimating a set of landmarks for a large image ensemble employs only a small number of manually labeled images from the ensemble and avoids labor-intensive and error-prone object detection, tracking and alignment learning task limitations associated with manual image labeling techniques. A semi-supervised least squares congealing approach is employed to minimize an objective function defined on both labeled and unlabeled images. A shape model is learned on-line to constrain the landmark configuration. A partitioning strategy allows coarse-to-fine landmark estimation.