Semi-Sync Data Replication Using Metadata Logs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data replication methods, such as sync and async replication, face challenges in balancing data consistency and performance, with sync replication ensuring zero data loss but degrading performance and async replication potentially leading to inconsistent data and long Recovery Point Objective (RPO).

Innovation Solution

A semi-sync replication method using metadata logs and data logs to determine overlaps between target and previous input/output (IO) operations, allowing for efficient data replication by writing target IOs to source data volumes only after overlap replication, and utilizing metadata and data logs to ensure consistency and reduce log size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sync replication is used to ensure zero data loss, then data consistency is improved, but host IO performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidhost IO performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the IO operation into two independent parts: the host IO completion (writing to source data volume) and the replication IO (writing to target data volume). By using the metadata log to track and manage replication IOs separately, the host IO no longer needs to wait for replication completion, thus resolving the contradiction between data consistency and host IO performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a metadata log as an intermediary component that records IO operations and their status. This metadata log acts as a mediator between the host IO system and the replication system, allowing the host to proceed without waiting for replication while still ensuring data consistency through the metadata tracking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If async replication is used to improve performance, then host IO performance is improved, but data consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehost IO performanceVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism through the metadata log that tracks the status of replication IOs. The system continuously monitors whether replication has completed and uses this feedback information to determine when data is consistent, thus maintaining data reliability while allowing async replication to improve host IO performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by recording metadata about IO operations in the metadata log before actual replication occurs. This preliminary metadata recording allows the system to track and verify data consistency without blocking host IO operations, resolving the contradiction between performance and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If frequent snapshots are used to reduce RPO in async replication, then Recovery Point Objective is improved, but source data volume performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRecovery Point ObjectiveVSAvoidsource data volume performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a metadata log that records IO operations rather than creating frequent snapshots of the entire data volume. This copying approach at the metadata level allows the system to track data changes and achieve low RPO without the performance overhead of frequent full snapshots, thus resolving the contradiction between RPO and source data volume performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the necessary metadata information (IO operations and their status) from the data volume changes, rather than copying entire snapshots. This extraction approach minimizes the impact on source data volume performance while still enabling accurate tracking for RPO calculation and data consistency verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If all target IOs are replicated to ensure data consistency, then data consistency is improved, but log size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidlog size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by recording only the specific metadata information necessary for tracking replication status (such as IO operation identifiers, timestamps, and status flags) rather than duplicating entire data blocks. This selective metadata recording maintains data consistency verification capability while minimizing log size growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a mechanism where metadata log entries are discarded (removed) after their purpose is fulfilled - specifically, after the associated replication IO completes or fails. This discarding of processed metadata entries prevents unbounded log growth while maintaining the ability to verify data consistency for active and recent operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20240338143A1Method, electronic device and computer program product for data replication
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 DELL PROD LP
  • US20240338143A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338143A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338143A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for data replication involve determining, based on a metadata log, whether an overlap exists between a target input/output operation or target IO and previous IOs, wherein the metadata log records metadata related to data replication. Such techniques further involve writing the target IO to a source data volume according to a determination that no overlap exists between the target IO and the previous IOs. Such techniques further involve replicating data within the range of the overlap from the source data volume to a data log according to a determination that the overlap exists between the target IO and the previous IOs, and writing the target IO to the source data volume after completion of the replicating. Such techniques further involve replicating the target IO to a target data volume based on the metadata log and the data log.