Semiconducting Polymers for Air-Stable Organic Thin Film Transistors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current silicon-based thin film transistors (TFTs) are costly and unsuitable for large-area electronic devices due to high manufacturing costs and complex fabrication processes, while n-type organic semiconductors with high electron mobility and air stability are rare, especially those that can be processed using solution-based methods.

Innovation Solution

Development of semiconducting polymers with a specific structure, including 1,3,4-heterodiazole moieties, which form linear and highly ordered polymer chains, allowing for low LUMO energy levels and functioning as both n-type and p-type semiconductors, stable in air, and suitable for use in thin film transistors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If silicon-based TFTs are used, then high switching speeds and high densities are achieved, but manufacturing costs increase and device flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from inorganic silicon to organic semiconducting polymers, enabling solution-based processing at lower costs while maintaining acceptable switching performance for display applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs low-cost organic semiconductor materials that can be processed using simple solution methods rather than expensive silicon fabrication, making large-area displays economically viable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Area of stationary object

If n-type organic semiconductors with electron-withdrawing groups are used, then low LUMO levels are achieved, but air stability deteriorates and synthesis difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLUMO energy levelVSAvoidair stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates composite molecular structures combining electron-withdrawing heterodiazole rings with electron-donating aromatic units, achieving low LUMO levels while the overall molecular structure provides air stability through balanced electron distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies electron-withdrawing groups locally at specific positions in the polymer chain (heterodiazole rings) rather than throughout the entire structure, maintaining low LUMO levels while preserving air stability in other regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If vacuum deposition techniques are used for small molecular n-type semiconductors, then maximum performance is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemiconductor performanceVSAvoidprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces vacuum deposition (mechanical/physical process) with solution-based processing (chemical process), enabling low-cost fabrication while maintaining semiconductor performance through proper molecular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses solution-processable polymer materials that can be deposited from liquid solutions using simple techniques like spin-coating or printing, eliminating the need for expensive vacuum equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Adaptability or versatility

If p-type semiconducting materials are used, then extensive research and availability are achieved, but electron transport capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial availabilityVSAvoidelectron mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using p-type materials that transport holes, the patent inverts the approach by designing n-type materials that transport electrons, achieving the required electron mobility for bottom-gate bottom-contact TFT configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentEP2157119B1Electronic device comprising semiconducting polymers
Publication Date: 2020.03.11 XEROX CORP
  • EP2157119B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP2157119B1 patent drawing
  • EP2157119B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device comprises a semiconducting polymer of Formula (I): wherein X is independently selected from S, Se, O, and NR, wherein R is independently selected from hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, aryl, substituted aryl, heteroaryl, and -CN; Ar is independently a conjugated divalent moiety; a is an integer from 1 to about 10; and n is an integer from 2 to about 5,000. The electronic device may be an organic thin film transistor.