Semiconductor Integrated Device Assembly for MEMS Acoustic Transducers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing manufacturing process for MEMS acoustic transducers is complex and does not optimize the dimensions of the acoustic chambers, limiting the design freedom and resulting in suboptimal electrical characteristics, particularly in compact applications.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor integrated device assembly with a package design that includes a base substrate and a cap element forming a cup-shaped structure, where the cap element is a composite substrate with a larger cavity extension than the access opening, allowing for a larger back chamber and reduced horizontal dimensions by vertically superimposing the second die over the first die, optimizing the acoustic performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the existing manufacturing process is used, then the transducer can be produced, but the manufacturing process is complex and design freedom is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is divided into distinct stages: forming the cavity in the cap element, bonding the cap to the base substrate, and then performing subsequent processing steps. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, simplifying the overall manufacturing process while maintaining design flexibility for the acoustic chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from planar packaging to three-dimensional vertical stacking, where the cap element is bonded to the base substrate to form a stacked configuration. This dimensional change enables independent optimization of front and back chamber volumes without increasing lateral footprint, thereby simplifying the manufacturing process while improving design freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If the existing package design is used, then electrical connection is enabled, but the dimensions of acoustic chambers are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic chamber dimensionsVSAvoiddesign freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity is formed in the cap element before bonding to the base substrate, allowing precise control over the back chamber volume. This preliminary action enables optimization of acoustic chamber dimensions while maintaining design freedom for different transducer configurations and applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Volume of moving object

If compact dimensions are required, then the transducer size is reduced, but the back chamber volume is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransducer sizeVSAvoidback chamber volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses vertical stacking of the cap element and base substrate to create a three-dimensional configuration. This allows the back chamber volume to be increased in the vertical dimension without increasing the lateral footprint, thereby achieving compact transducer dimensions while maintaining adequate back chamber volume for sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The second die is vertically superimposed over the first die within the package, creating a nested arrangement. This nesting allows both dice to be housed in a compact footprint while the cap element extends beyond to provide the required back chamber volume, resolving the contradiction between compact size and sufficient chamber volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Volume of stationary object

If the cap element cavity extension is larger than access opening, then back chamber volume is increased, but horizontal dimensions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback chamber volumeVSAvoidhorizontal dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention utilizes the vertical dimension by bonding the cap element to the base substrate in a stacked configuration. This allows the cavity in the cap element to extend beyond the access opening in the vertical direction, increasing back chamber volume without significantly increasing horizontal dimensions. The three-dimensional arrangement resolves the contradiction between chamber volume and footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8836111B2Semiconductor integrated device assembly and related manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US8836111B2 patent drawing
  • US8836111B2 patent drawing
  • US8836111B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is a semiconductor integrated device assembly, which envisages: a package defining an internal space; a first die including semiconductor material; and a second die, distinct from the first die, also including semiconductor material; the first die and the second die are coupled to an inner surface of the package facing the internal space. The second die is shaped so as to partially overlap the first die, above the inner surface, with a portion suspended in cantilever fashion above the first die, by an overlapping distance.