Semiconductor Process Digital Twins for RL Recipe and Subsystem Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional semiconductor process system design is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and uncertain, often leading to delays and increased costs due to the inability to predict system performance accurately during the design phase.

Innovation Solution

Employing reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in conjunction with system digital twins to simulate and optimize process systems in a virtual environment, reducing design time and increasing confidence in new designs by thoroughly evaluating their capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional process system design methods are used, then expert knowledge and extensive experimentation can guide the design, but the design process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin (virtual replica) of the semiconductor process system that copies the physical system's structure, parameters, and behavior. This digital model allows for virtual experimentation and optimization without affecting the actual physical system, enabling rapid iteration and evaluation of design alternatives while maintaining design quality through accurate modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary design optimization and validation in the virtual digital twin environment before implementing changes in the physical system. By conducting simulations, parameter optimizations, and performance evaluations beforehand, the system identifies the best design configurations in advance, reducing the need for extensive physical experimentation and accelerating the overall design process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional process system design methods are used, then extensive experimentation can be conducted, but uncertainty in system performance prediction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance prediction accuracyVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The digital twin creates a faithful virtual replica of the physical process system, capturing its complex behaviors, interactions, and performance characteristics. This copy enables accurate performance prediction through simulation, reducing uncertainty without requiring extensive physical experimentation that would increase design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where simulation results from the digital twin are used to automatically adjust design parameters and optimize performance. This closed-loop approach systematically reduces performance prediction uncertainty by continuously refining the design based on virtual experimentation data, avoiding the need for complex manual iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If reinforcement learning algorithms are employed with digital twins, then design time is reduced, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement learning algorithm operates autonomously within the digital twin environment, self-learning optimal design configurations through iterative exploration and exploitation. The system serves itself by automatically generating, evaluating, and refining design proposals without requiring extensive external intervention, thereby accelerating design speed while managing complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The digital twin acts as an intermediary between the reinforcement learning algorithm and the physical system. It provides a safe virtual environment where the RL algorithm can learn and experiment without directly affecting the physical equipment. This intermediary layer manages system complexity by confining complex AI operations to the virtual domain while maintaining simple interfaces with the physical system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the parameter space is expanded to explore more design options, then the likelihood of finding optimized recipes increases, but the computational burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign exploration capabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement learning algorithm dynamically adjusts and transforms parameter representations during the exploration process, learning efficient parameter transformations that capture the essential design space structure. This allows comprehensive exploration of design options while reducing computational burden by focusing on the most influential parameters and their optimal configurations rather than exhaustively searching all possible parameter combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs partial exploration strategies where the reinforcement learning algorithm focuses on exploring the most promising regions of the parameter space based on learned patterns and heuristics. Rather than uniformly exploring all parameter combinations, the system concentrates computational resources on partial exploration of high-value design regions, achieving effective design optimization with reduced computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260017443A1System and Method for Autonomously Designing Process Systems for Semiconductor Manufacturing through Reinforcement Learning
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 INSPIRING ATOMS PTE LTD
  • US20260017443A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017443A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017443A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for autonomously designing process systems for semiconductor manufacturing using subsystem and system digital twins. An artificial intelligence (AI) engine of an AI machine is utilized to explore a large process recipe parameter space and identify optimal process recipes through a reinforcement learning approach, leveraging a policy neural network and Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) program. The AI engine also identifies performance bottlenecks and mitigates them by redesigning the responsible subsystems within the process system.