Semiconductor Layout Patterning With Non-Perpendicular Bombardment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current photolithography processes face challenges in achieving small end-to-end separation distances between features on semiconductor wafers, leading to inefficient use of wafer area and limitations in feature scaling, as they can only produce side-to-side separation distances smaller than end-to-end distances.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor process system that incorporates a non-perpendicular particle bombardment process in conjunction with photolithography to reduce the end-to-end separation distances between features by analyzing layout data and adjusting the layout to utilize the particle bombardment system when end-to-end distances exceed a certain threshold, thereby improving feature density and wafer yield.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional photolithography processes are used to pattern photoresist, then side-to-side separation distances can be made small, but end-to-end separation distances remain larger than desired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend-to-end separation distanceVSAvoidwafer area utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the patterning process into two independent stages: first photolithography defines side-to-side spacing, then a separate non-perpendicular particle bombardment process defines end-to-end spacing. This segmentation allows each process to optimize for its specific directional requirement, achieving small end-to-end distances without compromising side-to-side precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new processing dimension by applying particle bombardment at non-perpendicular angles (e.g., 45 degrees) to the wafer surface. This angular approach allows material removal that specifically reduces end-to-end distances between features, a dimension of control that traditional perpendicular photolithography cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If photolithography alone is used for patterning, then the process is simple, but feature density is limited by larger end-to-end distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature densityVSAvoidprocessing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two distinct patterning techniques—photolithography and non-perpendicular particle bombardment—into a unified multi-step process. Photolithography establishes the primary feature layout with controlled side-to-side spacing, while particle bombardment subsequently refines the end-to-end spacing, together achieving high feature density that neither process could accomplish alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary photolithography patterning to establish feature positions and side-to-side spacing before applying the non-perpendicular particle bombardment process. This preliminary action creates a foundation that the subsequent bombardment process builds upon, allowing precise control of end-to-end distances without disrupting the previously established lateral feature arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Area of stationary object

If end-to-end separation distances are reduced to increase feature density, then wafer area utilization improves, but patterning difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer area utilizationVSAvoidpatterning difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the purely optical-mechanical photolithography system with a hybrid approach that incorporates physical particle bombardment. By using directed particle beams (ions or atoms) striking the photoresist at oblique angles, the process achieves mechanical material removal that precisely controls end-to-end distances, overcoming the diffraction and resolution limits of optical methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces end-to-end separation distances, allowing for more efficient use of wafer area, enabling denser formation of interconnect structures and improving wafer yields by overcoming the limitations of traditional photolithography processes.

Implementation Method 1

a non-perpendicular particle bombardment process in conjunction with photolithography to reduce the end-to-end separation distances between features

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParticle bombardment: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 2

Many etching processes involve depositing a layer of photoresist and patterning the photoresist by exposing the photoresist to ultraviolet light through a photolithography mask

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotolithography: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS20240395708A1System and method to reduce layout dimensions using non-perpendicular process scheme
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20240395708A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395708A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395708A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor processing system includes a layout database that stores a plurality of layouts indicating features to be formed in a wafer. The semiconductor processing system includes a layout analyzer that analyzes the layouts and determines, for each layout, whether a non-perpendicular particle bombardment process should be utilized in conjunction with a photolithography process for forming the features of the layout in a wafer.