Semiconductor Layout for Multi-Fin Speed and Leakage Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-fin FETs suffer from higher leakage and power consumption compared to single-fin FinFETs, hindering the achievement of both high switching speed and low power consumption in semiconductor devices.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of multi-fin and mono-fin active regions with optimized gate structures, source/drain features, and isolation techniques, including the use of high-K metal gate stacks and dielectric materials, to enhance performance and reduce leakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If multi-fin FETs are used to achieve high switching speed, then switching speed is improved, but power consumption increases due to higher leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into multiple fins within a single FET structure, allowing the channel to be segmented into parallel conduction paths. This segmentation increases the effective channel width and drive current for high switching speed while maintaining individual fin control to manage leakage through optimized fin spacing and isolation structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the multi-fin FET are given different properties: the fin width, spacing, and depth are locally optimized to balance drive current and leakage. The source/drain regions are selectively doped in different areas, and isolation structures are placed at specific locations between fins to suppress leakage while preserving high-speed performance in critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If fin width is reduced to achieve short channel control, then short channel control is improved, but source/drain contact landing area decreases leading to higher contact resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshort channel controlVSAvoidcontact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The solution moves from a two-dimensional contact problem to three dimensions by forming raised source/drain structures and using sidewall spacers to create vertical contact paths. The contact landing area is extended in the vertical dimension through elevated S/D regions, allowing adequate contact area even when the horizontal fin width is reduced for better short channel control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Source/drain extensions are formed preliminarily before the main source/drain regions, creating a graded transition that reduces contact resistance. The sidewall spacers are formed in advance to define the final contact dimensions and ensure proper alignment, allowing the contact structure to be optimized independently of the fin dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250324763A1Semiconductor device layout
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20250324763A1 patent drawing
  • US20250324763A1 patent drawing
  • US20250324763A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor structure includes: an isolation feature and a first device on a first side of the isolation feature. The first device includes: a first plurality of fins, a first gate structure extending across the first plurality of fins, and a first source/drain contact disposed over the first plurality of fins. The semiconductor structure includes a second device on a second side of the isolation feature opposite the first side. The second device includes: a first fin aligned with one of the first plurality of fins along a first direction, a second gate structure extending across the first fin, and a second source/drain contact disposed over the first fin.