Semiconductor Measurement Validation via Simulated Data Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The scaling down of semiconductor ICs leads to complex measurement challenges on wafer topography surfaces, causing errors in tools like scanning electron microscopes, requiring significant labor and time for verification.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a smart review engine that generates simulated measurement data using SEM tool parameters, allowing for comparison with actual data to validate accuracy and efficiency, reducing human intervention in the validation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If scaling down is performed to increase production efficiency and lower costs, then productivity improves, but measurement precision deteriorates due to complex topography and scaled down features causing measurement errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simulated measurement data copy that mirrors the actual measurement process. The simulation engine generates synthetic measurement data based on design data and measurement tool parameters, allowing validation without additional physical measurements. This copying approach maintains measurement precision while preserving the benefits of scaling down for productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary simulation of measurement data before actual measurement validation. By pre-generating simulated measurement data and establishing validation criteria in advance, the system prepares the validation framework beforehand, enabling quick comparison and validation of actual measurements without time-consuming manual verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual verification is performed to ensure measurement accuracy, then measurement precision is maintained, but loss of time increases due to significant labor and time required for verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service validation where the measurement tool automatically compares actual measurement data against simulated measurement data using predefined validation criteria. The system validates its own measurements without requiring external manual verification, maintaining measurement precision while eliminating the time and labor costs associated with manual verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback mechanism where measurement data is automatically validated by comparing it with simulated data, and validation results are fed back to confirm measurement accuracy. This automated feedback loop replaces manual verification, maintaining precision while reducing verification time significantly through systematic automated comparison and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated validation is implemented to reduce time and labor, then productivity improves, but device complexity increases due to the smart review engine and simulation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the simulation engine to serve multiple functions: generating simulated measurement data, validating actual measurements, and providing verification results. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single versatile engine, improving verification productivity while managing device complexity through functional integration rather than proliferation of separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces the time and labor required for verifying measurement data by automating the validation process, improving accuracy and efficiency in IC manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

performing a measurement on the material feature by applying an electron beam on the material feature and collecting a secondary electron signal from the material feature using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

collecting a secondary electron signal from the material feature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary electron emission: Electron Impact Desorption

Data Source

PatentUS11353324B2Method for validating measurement data
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11353324B2 patent drawing
  • US11353324B2 patent drawing
  • US11353324B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving, into a measurement tool, a substrate having a material feature, wherein the material feature is formed on the substrate according to a design feature. The method further includes applying a source signal on the material feature, collecting a response signal from the material feature by using the measurement tool, and with a computer connected to the measurement tool, calculating a simulated response signal from the design feature. The method further includes, with the computer, in response to determining that a difference between the collected response signal and the simulated response signal exceeds a predetermined value, causing the measurement tool to re-measure the material feature.