Semiconductor Process ML Control for Wafer Uniformity Drift

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor wafer processing complexity increases with shrinking device sizes, requiring multiple steps and numerous knobs for optimization, leading to resource consumption and difficulty in maintaining target quality and consistency, with manual optimization being inadequate for large process spaces and process drift detection.

Innovation Solution

Implementing machine learning models for pixelated-control of temperature, gas flow, and localized plasma generation in semiconductor processing systems, enabling real-time prediction and adjustment of process parameters to maintain uniformity and detect drift.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multiple process steps and knobs are used to optimize semiconductor manufacturing, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess optimizationVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using machine learning models to automatically adjust and optimize multiple process parameters simultaneously. The system learns optimal parameter combinations from historical data and applies them to maintain manufacturing precision without requiring manual tuning of each parameter, thus resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning system performs self-service by autonomously optimizing process parameters without continuous human intervention. The model learns from process data and automatically adjusts settings, enabling the system to maintain high manufacturing precision while reducing the operational complexity burden on engineers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If design of experiment is used to tailor process, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess tailoringVSAvoidDoE data collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs preliminary action by pre-learning optimal process configurations from historical data before actual production. This allows the system to quickly recommend optimized processes without requiring extensive new DoE experiments, significantly reducing the time loss while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by replicating successful process patterns learned from historical DoE data. Instead of performing complete new experiments, the model copies and adapts proven process configurations to new situations, achieving fast process tailoring with minimal time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If full wafers are dedicated for DoE, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of substance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess optimizationVSAvoidwafer consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning approach applies partial action by using only the necessary minimum data for training the model, rather than consuming full wafers for DoE. The system achieves process optimization through intelligent analysis of partial data sets, significantly reducing wafer consumption while maintaining optimization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of operation

If manual monitoring is used to detect process drift, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator simplicityVSAvoiddrift detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical monitoring with an automated machine learning-based detection system. The ML model continuously analyzes process data to detect drift with high precision, eliminating the limitations of manual monitoring while maintaining ease of operation through automated alerts and recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by automatically monitoring process parameters and comparing them against learned normal patterns. When drift is detected, the system provides feedback to operators or automatically adjusts parameters, achieving high measurement precision for drift detection while keeping operations simple through automated responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12444655B2Machine learning model for semiconductor manufacturing processes
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12444655B2 patent drawing
  • US12444655B2 patent drawing
  • US12444655B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes methods and systems for training and deploying a machine learning predictive model for use in a semiconductor manufacturing process. Specifically, the present disclosure provides for training machine learning predictive models for manufacturing components using design data, process parameters, gas flow configurations from a pixelated showerhead, temperature profile across an electrostatic chuck, and measured uniformity profiles of processed wafers. The present disclosure also provides for deploying the machine learning predictive model to effectuate real-time adjustments to a manufacturing process.