Semiconductor Module Overcurrent Detection Beyond Comparator Common Mode

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intelligent power switches (IPS) with overcurrent detection functions face challenges in detecting overcurrent states when input voltages fall outside the common mode input range, particularly due to short-circuits, which can prevent accurate detection and lead to circuit damage.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor module design that includes a first switching device, a voltage generation circuit, a resistor, a reference voltage circuit, and a comparator circuit, where the comparator circuit determines the overcurrent state by comparing the voltage across the resistor with a reference voltage, ensuring detection even when input voltages are outside the common mode range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional comparator circuit is used for overcurrent detection, then the circuit structure is simple, but the overcurrent detection fails when input voltages fall outside the common mode input range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovercurrent detection reliabilityVSAvoidcomparator circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The voltage input to the comparator is segmented into two independent paths: one path provides the voltage to be compared (via the resistor connected to the switching device), and the other path provides a reference voltage that is shifted by a predetermined amount. This segmentation allows each input to be independently controlled within the common mode range, resolving the contradiction between detection reliability and circuit complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If rail-to-rail input comparators are used to detect overcurrent outside common mode range, then overcurrent detection coverage is improved, but circuit area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage detection rangeVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The reference voltage parameter is changed by shifting it by a predetermined amount relative to the voltage to be compared. This parameter change allows the comparator to detect overcurrent conditions across a wider voltage range without requiring rail-to-rail input comparators, thus achieving broader adaptability while maintaining a compact circuit area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If the comparator inputs are directly connected to the switching device terminals, then the detection response is fast, but the input voltages may fall outside the common mode input range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection response speedVSAvoidcomparator operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

An intermediary reference voltage is introduced that is shifted by a predetermined amount relative to the switching device terminal voltage. This intermediary voltage acts as a mediator, allowing the comparator to operate reliably within its common mode range while still detecting overcurrent conditions that occur across a broader voltage range, thus maintaining both fast response and operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The semiconductor module effectively detects overcurrent states, protecting the circuit from damage by accurately determining the overcurrent condition even in scenarios where input voltages are below the common mode range, such as during short-circuits, without requiring a large circuit area for rail-to-rail input comparators.

Implementation Method 1

a third voltage corresponding to the second current being generated across the resistor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOhm's Law: Ohm's Law

Implementation Method 2

a comparator circuit coupled between the first line and the second line, the comparator circuit being configured to determine whether the first switching device is in an overcurrent state based on a comparison between the third voltage and the fourth voltage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoltage comparison:

Data Source

PatentUS12160228B2Semiconductor module
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 FUJI ELECTRIC CO LTD
  • US12160228B2 patent drawing
  • US12160228B2 patent drawing
  • US12160228B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor module including a first switching device coupled to a first line, a terminal, at which a first voltage corresponding to a first current flowing through the first switching device is generated, coupled to the first switching device, a second switching device coupled to the first line for allowing a second current corresponding to the first current to flow therethrough, a voltage generation circuit configured to apply, to a second line, a second voltage lower than a power supply voltage, a resistor, across which a third voltage corresponding to the second current is generated, coupled between the second switching device and the terminal, a reference voltage circuit coupled to the terminal for generating a fourth voltage, and a comparator circuit coupled between the first and second lines, for determining whether the first switching device is in an overcurrent state based on a comparison between the third and fourth voltages.