Semiconductor Patterning Using Multi-Step Masking for Sub-Critical Dimensions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current photolithographic processes are limited by minimum achievable feature sizes and gap widths, which hinder the production of smaller semiconductor structures, particularly in transistor gate channels, leading to increased power consumption and reduced performance due to high-temperature oxidation processes and high costs associated with advanced photolithographic techniques.

Innovation Solution

A method involving multiple photolithographic patterning steps with positive and negative ramp angles applied to mask layers, allowing for the reduction of structure sizes below the critical dimensions, enabling the production of semiconductor components with feature sizes smaller than those achievable by standard photolithographic systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If standard photolithographic processes are used, then manufacturing costs are controlled, but minimum achievable feature sizes and gap widths are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature sizeVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single photolithographic patterning process into multiple sequential patterning steps. Each step creates features at different locations on the substrate, allowing the cumulative effect to achieve smaller effective feature sizes and gap widths than any single step could produce alone, while using existing photolithographic equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension by performing multiple patterning steps sequentially rather than attempting to create all features in a single step. This multi-step temporal approach enables achieving sub-critical dimensions that would be impossible in a single spatial patterning operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Use of energy by moving object

If gate channel length is reduced, then power consumption decreases and clock rate increases, but minimum achievable feature size limits further reduction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidgate channel length
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The gate channel patterning is divided into multiple photolithographic steps, each creating portions of the final gate structure. This segmentation allows the effective gate channel length to be reduced beyond the critical dimension limit of single-step photolithography, enabling lower power consumption and higher clock rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If high-temperature oxidation process is used to produce oxide spacer, then gate structures are formed, but transistor performance is detrimentally affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate structure formationVSAvoidtransistor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the process parameters by using multiple photolithographic patterning steps with varying exposure conditions and developing processes. This allows precise control of feature formation without requiring high-temperature oxidation, thereby maintaining transistor performance while achieving the necessary gate structure formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If advanced photolithographic process is used to achieve smaller structures, then feature size is reduced, but significant additional cost outlay is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature sizeVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of investing in expensive advanced photolithographic equipment, the patent segments the patterning process into multiple steps using existing equipment. This approach achieves smaller effective feature sizes through process decomposition rather than through costly hardware upgrades

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies multiple photolithographic patterning steps, where each step creates partial features that are completed in subsequent steps. This excessive action of applying more steps than a conventional single-step process enables achieving smaller dimensions without requiring more advanced (and expensive) single-step equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the creation of semiconductor structures with feature sizes and gap widths below the minimum critical dimensions, reducing power consumption and improving transistor performance while minimizing costs by achieving smaller gate channel lengths and tighter gate spacings.

Implementation Method 1

structures are projected onto a photosensitive layer by means of a photolithographic stepper or scanner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotolithographic patterning: Photography

Data Source

PatentUS8802566B2Method for producing semiconductor components on a substrate, and substrate comprising semiconductor components
Publication Date: 2014.08.12 ESPROS PHOTONICS
  • US8802566B2 patent drawing
  • US8802566B2 patent drawing
  • US8802566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing semiconductor components on a substrate including photolithographic patterning steps, in which method, on the substrate, a first layer to be patterned is applied and a second layer serving as a mask layer for the first layer to be patterned is applied, wherein a third layer serving as a mask for the second layer is applied, and wherein at least two photolithographic patterning processes are carried out successively for the second layer, wherein, during one of the patterning processes, after the production of a structure made from a photosensitive layer for the provision of a mask layer for a patterning process at the third layer, positive ramp angles α are produced at the patterning edges of the third layer, as a result of which the structures remaining free, given a thickness h of the third layer, decrease in size by a value D=2*h/tan α.