Semiconductor Qubit CAD with Poisson-Schrodinger Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing and implementing semiconductor-based qubits remains a challenging problem due to the complexity of characterizing and fabricating these quantum devices, which is exacerbated by the need to account for material defects and dynamic noise sources.

Innovation Solution

A quantum technology computer-aided design (Q-TCAD) system that includes a user interface for defining qubit systems, physical and dynamic simulations, and solvers to model semiconductor-based qubits, allowing for the characterization and optimization of qubit operations while incorporating material defects and noise sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive physical and dynamic simulations are performed to accurately characterize qubit systems, then measurement precision and reliability of qubit characterization are improved, but computational time and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequbit system characterization accuracyVSAvoidsimulation computational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation process is divided into two distinct stages: physical simulations that compute eigenenergies and eigenfunctions using Poisson-Schrodinger equations, and dynamic simulations that model qubit operations using extracted parameters. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, reducing overall computational time while maintaining comprehensive characterization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Physical simulations are performed first to extract fundamental parameters (eigenenergies, eigenfunctions, quality control metrics) before dynamic simulations are conducted. This preliminary action provides pre-computed inputs for the dynamic stage, eliminating the need to recompute physical properties during dynamic operation modeling, thereby reducing total computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If material defects and dynamic noise sources are incorporated into simulations to account for fabrication yields, then reliability of qubit fabrication is improved, but device complexity and simulation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication yield prediction accuracyVSAvoidsimulation model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation framework allows selective incorporation of material defects and noise sources at specific locations and times. Rather than uniformly modeling all possible defects throughout the entire system, the model focuses on local defect characteristics and their specific impacts on qubit performance, reducing overall model complexity while maintaining reliability predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Extracted parameters from physical simulations serve as intermediaries that bridge the gap between physical device characteristics and dynamic operation modeling. These parameters (eigenenergies, eigenfunctions, quality control metrics) encapsulate the effects of material defects and noise sources in a simplified form, reducing the complexity of subsequent dynamic simulations while maintaining accurate reliability predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If self-consistent Poisson-Schrodinger process with Fock and Configuration Interaction calculations is employed, then manufacturing precision of qubit design is improved, but use of energy and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequbit design accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The computationally intensive Poisson-Schrodinger calculations with Fock and Configuration Interaction methods are performed as a preliminary step to extract fundamental physical parameters. Once these parameters are computed, they are used as inputs for subsequent dynamic simulations, avoiding the need to reperform the expensive physical simulations during dynamic operation modeling, thereby reducing total energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The physical simulation results (eigenenergies, eigenfunctions, quality control metrics) are copied and reused as input parameters for dynamic simulations. This copying approach allows the complex physical models to be applied once to establish a foundation for multiple dynamic operation analyses, reducing redundant computational energy consumption while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable fabrication of high-fidelity, high-yield qubit components by accurately simulating qubit operations and accounting for fabrication yields, improving the efficiency and production yield of quantum chips.

Implementation Method 1

a self-consistent Poisson-Schrodinger process that includes both Fock and Configuration Interaction calculations for generating a set of lowest-energy eigenenergies and eigenfunctions representing the semiconductor-based qubit system in the presence of DC gate voltages

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPoisson equation: Poisson's Effect

Implementation Method 2

a self-consistent Poisson-Schrodinger process that includes both Fock and Configuration Interaction calculations for generating a set of lowest-energy eigenenergies and eigenfunctions representing the semiconductor-based qubit system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSchrodinger equation:

Implementation Method 3

A quantum computer is a computing device that exploits quantum mechanical phenomena in its operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum mechanical phenomena:

Data Source

PatentUS20260030423A1Quantum technology computer-aided design system
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 QUANTUM ELEMENTS INC
  • US20260030423A1 patent drawing
  • US20260030423A1 patent drawing
  • US20260030423A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A quantum technology computer aided design system characterizes and optimizes semiconductor-based qubit systems based on user-provided information through physical and dynamic simulations of the system using sets of solvers. The physical simulations employ a self-consistent Poisson-Schrodinger process that includes both Fock and Configuration Interaction calculations for generating the set of lowest-energy eigenenergies and eigenfunctions representing the user-specified qubit(s) in the presence of some DC gate voltages. The eigenenergies and eigenfunctions are used to evaluate quality control metrics of the semiconductor-based qubit system for a range of gate voltages. The dynamic simulations are facilitated through extraction of physical parameters of the semiconductor-based qubit system from the physical simulations to a first-quantized effective Hamiltonian, followed by the mapping of the first-quantized effective Hamiltonian to a second-quantized effective Hamiltonian used to dynamically model qubit operations within an open quantum system framework and extract their performance metrics in the presence of relevant noise sources.