Semiconductor Device Sealing Feature for Hermetic MEMS Bonding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for forming Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) devices are not entirely satisfactory in achieving optimal mechanical functionality and hermetic sealing, leading to challenges in device performance and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor device structure is formed by bonding a semiconductor substrate with a cap substrate, creating a sealed chamber around movable features, and using a sealing feature to enhance hermetic protection and bonding strength without requiring high-temperature and high-pressing forces, thereby preventing device cracking and reducing fabrication costs and time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high-temperature and high-pressing forces are used for bonding substrates, then bonding strength is improved, but device cracking increases and fabrication complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoiddevice cracking
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A sealing feature is introduced as an intermediary element between the semiconductor substrate and cap substrate. This sealing feature fills trenches in both substrates and provides bonding surfaces that enable strong adhesion without requiring high-temperature and high-pressing forces, thereby preventing device cracking while maintaining bonding strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The bonding process parameters (temperature and pressure) are changed from traditional high-temperature/high-pressure conditions to lower, more controlled conditions. The sealing feature enables effective bonding at these reduced parameters, eliminating the need for extreme conditions that cause cracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If metal bonding processes are used, then bonding strength is improved, but fabrication cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidfabrication cost and time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The metal bonding process is extracted and replaced from the fabrication sequence. Instead of using metal bonding, the invention employs a sealing feature-based bonding approach that eliminates the need for metal layers and complex bonding equipment, thereby reducing fabrication cost and time while maintaining bonding strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing feature acts as a disposable, single-use bonding element that is formed through simple trench filling and curing processes. This replaces expensive, time-consuming metal bonding processes, making the overall fabrication more cost-effective and efficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If hermetic sealing is improved, then device reliability is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehermetic protectionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hermetic sealing function is merged with the bonding structure. The sealing feature simultaneously provides hermetic protection and mechanical bonding between substrates, eliminating the need for separate sealing layers and complex multi-step sealing processes, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity while improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly enhances the device performance and reliability of MEMS devices by ensuring precise alignment and strong bonding between substrates, maintaining desired pressure within the chamber, and providing effective hermetic protection without the need for metal bonding processes.

Implementation Method 1

forming a sealing feature over the third surface of the cap substrate to fill the chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Containment: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 2

bonding a semiconductor substrate with a cap substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS9834435B1Structure and formation method of semiconductor device structure
Publication Date: 2017.12.05 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US9834435B1 patent drawing
  • US9834435B1 patent drawing
  • US9834435B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Structures and formation methods of a semiconductor device structure are provided. A semiconductor device structure includes a semiconductor substrate including a cavity and a movable feature in the cavity. The semiconductor device structure also includes a cap substrate bonded to the semiconductor substrate to seal the cavity. There is an interface between the cap substrate and the semiconductor substrate. The semiconductor device structure further includes a sealing feature embedded in the semiconductor substrate and surrounding the cavity. The sealing feature extends across the interface and penetrates through the cap substrate.