Semiconductor Constructions Using Silicon Nitride Sacrificial Etching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional semiconductor processing methods face challenges in aligning electrical contacts due to aggressive etching of silicon nitride structures, which can lead to corner damage, facet formation, and undesired electrical shorting, making it difficult to scale to smaller dimensions for increased integration.

Innovation Solution

Reversing the roles of silicon nitride and silicon dioxide by using silicon nitride as a sacrificial material and silicon dioxide as a patterning material, employing a low-bias etch to remove silicon nitride, which reduces capacitive coupling and avoids the use of high-bias etches that damage silicon nitride structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-bias etch is used to remove silicon dioxide sacrificial material relative to silicon nitride, then etching speed is improved, but silicon nitride structures are damaged causing corner rounding and electrical shorting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching speedVSAvoidstructural integrity of silicon nitride
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by using silicon nitride as the sacrificial material and silicon dioxide as the patterned material, allowing low-bias etch to remove the sacrificial material without damaging the patterned material structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the etching parameter from high-bias to low-bias etching, which fundamentally alters the etching mechanism to be less damaging to the patterned material while still achieving effective removal of the sacrificial material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional etching methods are used, then processing is simpler, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to corner damage and facet formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidcontact alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By swapping the roles of silicon nitride and silicon dioxide, the patent achieves precise contact alignment through low-bias etching that preserves corner integrity, while the process remains relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of aggressive etching into a benefit by using low-bias etching conditions that naturally protect the patterned material corners, turning a previously problematic process into a precision-enabling step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If component size is decreased for increased integration, then integration level is improved, but etching selectivity and precision become more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration levelVSAvoidetching precision at small dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the etching parameter to low-bias conditions, which provides better control and precision at smaller dimensions by reducing the aggressive nature of the etching process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

By inverting the material roles, the patent enables scaling to smaller dimensions while maintaining etching precision, as the low-bias etch selectively removes silicon nitride without damaging adjacent silicon dioxide structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more precise and cleaner etching, reducing the risk of electrical shorting and allowing for higher levels of integration by using silicon dioxide spacers with a lower dielectric constant, thereby facilitating the scaling of semiconductor processing.

Implementation Method 1

employing a low-bias etch to remove silicon nitride, which reduces capacitive coupling and avoids the use of high-bias etches that damage silicon nitride structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective etching:

Data Source

PatentUS11678477B2Semiconductor constructions, and semiconductor processing methods
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11678477B2 patent drawing
  • US11678477B2 patent drawing
  • US11678477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments include methods in which a pair of spaced-apart adjacent features is formed over a substrate. The features have silicon dioxide surfaces. Silicon nitride is deposited between the features. A first region of the silicon nitride is protected with a mask while a second region is not. The second region is removed to form an opening between the features. Some embodiments include semiconductor constructions that contain a pair of spaced-apart adjacent features. The features are lines extending along a first direction and are spaced from one another by a trench. Alternating plugs and intervening materials are within the trench, with the plugs and intervening materials alternating along the first direction. The intervening materials consist of silicon nitride, and the plugs have lateral peripheries that directly contact silicon dioxide of the features, and that directly contact silicon nitride of the intervening regions.