Semiconductor Substrate Evaluation via Segmented Depletion Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional semiconductor substrate evaluating methods are limited in evaluating the quality of silicon wafers beyond a depth of several tens of nanometers for surface electrical characteristics and 1 μm for leakage current, failing to accurately assess deep region substrate quality, which is crucial for high-yield semiconductor devices like CCDs and CMOS sensors.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor substrate evaluating method involving the growth of an epitaxial layer with a different conductivity type, forming a well and channel stop layer, and diffusing dopants to create a pn junction, allowing for the measurement of junction leakage currents from two depletion layers using a Test Element Group (TEG) composed of cells, which reflects the wafer quality in both deep and surface regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional GOI evaluation or leakage current measurement methods are used, then surface electrical characteristics can be evaluated, but the evaluation depth is limited to several tens of nanometers for surface characteristics and only 1 μm for leakage current, failing to assess deep region substrate quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation depthVSAvoidsubstrate quality assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation structure is segmented into multiple depletion layers at different depths: a first depletion layer formed in the well region (evaluating surface/near-surface quality up to 1 μm depth) and a second depletion layer formed at the interface between the epitaxial layer and substrate (evaluating deep region quality). This segmentation allows simultaneous evaluation of both surface and deep substrate regions, resolving the contradiction between measurement depth and assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extends the evaluation from a single-depth measurement to multi-depth measurement by utilizing the vertical dimension of the epitaxial layer structure. The first depletion layer evaluates characteristics in the well region (shallower depth), while the second depletion layer at the epitaxial-substrate interface evaluates deeper substrate quality, effectively adding a depth dimension to the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If a pn junction is formed in a wafer surface with a guard ring structure, then leakage current can be measured to evaluate wafer quality, but parasitic depletion capacitance and defects affecting Gate Oxide Integrity may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage current measurement accuracyVSAvoidparasitic depletion capacitance and GOI defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

An intrinsic or lightly-doped epitaxial layer is introduced as an intermediary between the substrate and the well region. This epitaxial layer acts as a mediator that prevents direct interaction between the guard ring structure and the substrate, thereby eliminating parasitic depletion capacitance and preventing defects that would otherwise affect Gate Oxide Integrity, while still allowing accurate leakage current measurement through the controlled depletion layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The epitaxial layer provides locally different doping characteristics: it is intrinsic or lightly-doped in the regions forming the depletion layers (enabling precise leakage current measurement) while being structured to prevent parasitic effects in the guard ring regions. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between measurement accuracy and prevention of harmful parasitic effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables highly accurate evaluation of leakage current characteristics, preventing parasitic depletion capacitance and avoiding defects that affect Gate Oxide Integrity, thereby ensuring high-quality wafer evaluation for deep and surface regions.

Implementation Method 1

an epitaxial layer having a second conductivity type different from the first conductivity type is grown

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxial growth: Epitaxy

Implementation Method 2

a dopant having the first conductivity type different from the conductivity type of the well is diffused in the well to form a pn junction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS9696368B2Semiconductor substrate evaluating method, semiconductor substrate for evaluation, and semiconductor device
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 SHIN ETSU HANDOTAI CO LTD
  • US9696368B2 patent drawing
  • US9696368B2 patent drawing
  • US9696368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

On an EP substrate 1, an EP layer 2 having a conductivity type different from that of the EP substrate 1 is grown. With ion implantation, a well 5 having the same conductivity type as the EP layer 2 is formed, and a channel stop layer 10 is also formed. A dopant having a conductivity type different from that of the well 5 is diffused in the well 5 to form a pn junction 7 in the well 5. A plurality of cells 20 each having the diffusion layer 6 as one electrode and a rear surface 1a as the other electrode are formed as a TEG. Using the TEG, junction leakage currents from two depletion layers, a depletion layer 8 in the well and a depletion layer 4 at an interface between the EP layer 2 and the EP substrate 1, are measured.