Semiconductor Switch Dynamic Safe State Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices struggle to simultaneously protect vehicle electrical systems from thermal overload and ensure availability-relevant supply of safety-critical functions, as the safe state for thermal overload protection conflicts with the need to maintain energy supply for autonomous driving and drive-by-wire systems.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising a semiconductor switch, a detection unit, an activation unit, and a control unit that selectively switches the semiconductor switch into a safe state based on vehicle states, allowing for prioritization between protective shutdown and maintaining energy supply, using a field-effect transistor (FET) like a MOSFET, and an integrated circuit with a malfunction shutdown unit for rapid switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the device switches into the safe OFF state to protect against thermal overload, then protection against electrical malfunction is improved, but the availability-relevant supply of safety-critical functions is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against thermal overloadVSAvoidavailability-relevant supply of safety-critical functions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic safe state selection where the control unit can switch between first safe state (OFF) and second safe state (ON) based on vehicle state. The system transitions from a static safe state approach to a dynamic one where the appropriate safe state is selected based on real-time vehicle operating conditions, diagnostic results, and safety-critical function requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of safe state selection from a fixed condition to a variable condition based on vehicle state. The control unit evaluates multiple parameters including vehicle operating mode, diagnostic coverage results, and safety-critical function status to determine which safe state (OFF or ON) should be activated, thereby adapting the protection strategy to current system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the device maintains energy supply for autonomous driving functions, then availability-relevant supply is improved, but protection against thermal overload is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability-relevant supply of safety-critical functionsVSAvoidprotection against thermal overload
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit acts as an intermediary between the detection unit and the semiconductor switch. It receives diagnostic information from the detection unit, evaluates the situation considering vehicle state and safety-critical function requirements, and then determines the appropriate safe state to activate. This intermediary function allows for nuanced decision-making that balances protection and availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of vehicle state and diagnostic results before selecting a safe state. The control unit assesses whether maintaining energy supply is acceptable based on pre-established safety criteria and vehicle operating conditions, thereby making a proactive decision that prevents both unnecessary shutdowns and inadequate protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the device uses a single semiconductor switch, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to provide both protection and continuous supply is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of semiconductor switchesVSAvoidability to provide protective shutdown and maintaining energy supply
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The single semiconductor switch is designed to perform multiple functions: it can be switched to the first safe state (OFF) for protection against thermal overload, or to the second safe state (ON) for maintaining availability-relevant supply of safety-critical functions. The control unit enables this single component to universally serve both protective and operational roles based on system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamic control over the single semiconductor switch, allowing it to adapt its function based on vehicle state and diagnostic results. Rather than using multiple static switches for different functions, the single switch dynamically transitions between protective and operational modes under control unit management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10153632B2Device and method for protecting an electrical system component of a vehicle electrical system
Publication Date: 2018.12.11 LISA DRAXLMAIER GMBH
  • US10153632B2 patent drawing
  • US10153632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments relate to a device and method for protecting an electrical system component of a vehicle electrical system. The device comprises a semiconductor switch connected to the electrical system component. A circuit connected to the semiconductor switch comprises a detection unit for detecting an electrical malfunction of the vehicle electrical system and an activation unit for activating the semiconductor switch. A control unit communicatively connected to the circuit is configured to switch the semiconductor switch into a first safe state, in which the semiconductor switch is switched off, based on the detection of an electrical malfunction, and to selectively switch the semiconductor switch into the first safe state or into a second safe state, in which the semiconductor switch is switched on, based on at least one predetermined vehicle state.