Semiconductor Test Device Segmentation Reduces I/O Burst Length

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing automatic test equipment (ATE) for semiconductor devices faces challenges in reducing test time due to physically restricted input/output resources, leading to increased burst lengths of test signals and consequently higher manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A test device with an integer number of input and output resources is designed to receive an integer number of test signals from devices under test on a wafer, incorporating a comparative circuit to generate test result signals and a memory to store bad cell and repair information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the number of input/output resources of ATE is physically restricted, then the burst length of test signals must be increased, but this increases the test time required to test semiconductor devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of input/output resourcesVSAvoidtest time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the test process by dividing the wafer into multiple regions and using multiple probe groups, where each probe group can independently test different regions simultaneously. This segmentation allows parallel testing, effectively reducing test time despite limited input/output resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential testing along a single dimension to two-dimensional parallel testing by arranging multiple probe groups in different spatial locations on the wafer. This dimensional approach enables simultaneous testing of multiple devices, overcoming the bottleneck of limited I/O resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If the burst length of test signals is increased due to restricted input/output resources, then fewer input/output terminals are needed, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of input/output terminalsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the testing into multiple parallel probe groups, the patent reduces the burst length required for each group while maintaining overall testing efficiency. This allows the use of fewer I/O terminals per probe group, reducing manufacturing costs without sacrificing test coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of burst length from a long sequential transmission to shorter parallel transmissions across multiple probe groups. This parameter optimization reduces the complexity and cost of I/O terminal requirements while maintaining test effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250149107A1Test device, operating method of test device, and semiconductor device test system
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250149107A1 patent drawing
  • US20250149107A1 patent drawing
  • US20250149107A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A test device includes a plurality of input/output terminals configured to be electrically connected to the devices formed on the wafer, a comparative circuit configured to receive a plurality of test signals from a device under test formed on the wafer, and generate a plurality of test result signals, based on the plurality of test signals, and a memory configured to receive the plurality of test result signals and store bad cell information and repair information related to the device under test, which are indicated by the plurality of test result signals, wherein the total number of the plurality of test signals received from the device under test at one time is an integer.