Semiconductor Circuit Design Using Topographical Rules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional semiconductor chip design relies on simplistic models leading to inaccuracies due to one-dimensional analysis, resulting in suboptimal design rules and reduced yields, as the complex shapes of features on wafers are not accurately represented.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Topographical Design Rules (TDRs) and Monte Carlo simulations using advanced photolithography and process variability band analysis to derive more accurate and complex shape representations, allowing for rigorous evaluation of design space and optimized design rules that account for variations in feature dimensions and spatial relationships.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If simple geometric models are used for design analysis, then the analysis process is simple and fast, but the accuracy of feature shape representation is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of feature shape representationVSAvoidcomplexity of design analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional analysis (considering only critical dimension tolerances) to two-dimensional analysis by incorporating shape descriptors that capture angular information and geometric complexity. This dimensional expansion enables accurate representation of complex feature shapes while maintaining computational feasibility through systematic mathematical formulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces shape descriptors as additional parameters beyond traditional critical dimensions. These descriptors include angular measurements and geometric characteristics that fundamentally change the parameter set used in design analysis, enabling precise characterization of complex shapes without requiring full two-dimensional imaging or excessively complex models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If conventional one-dimensional analysis is used, then the design process is simple, but the yield and die size positioning are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield and die size positioningVSAvoidaccuracy of design space assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where shape descriptors derived from actual manufactured features are used to refine and update design rules. This closed-loop approach continuously improves the accuracy of design space assessment by incorporating real manufacturing data, leading to optimized yield and die size positioning through iterative refinement of design parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary characterization of feature shapes using shape descriptors before final design rule establishment. By预先 analyzing the geometric characteristics and angular properties of manufactured features, the system proactively identifies optimal design parameters that will maximize yield and achieve accurate die size positioning before full-scale production begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If simplistic shape models are assumed, then the manufacturing process is easier to control, but errors of several to tens of nanometers occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature dimension accuracyVSAvoidsimplicity of design rules
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using shape descriptors to characterize specific local geometric features such as corners and edges individually. Rather than applying a uniform simple model to all features, the system captures the unique geometric characteristics of each feature type, enabling precise control of local manufacturing variations while maintaining overall process simplicity through standardized measurement approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7861195B2Process for design of semiconductor circuits
Publication Date: 2010.12.28 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US7861195B2 patent drawing
  • US7861195B2 patent drawing
  • US7861195B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention generates model scenarios of semiconductor chip design and uses interpolation and Monte Carlo, with random number generation inputs, techniques to iteratively assess the models for a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of design space, and evaluation under projected manufacturing conditions. This evaluation information is then incorporated into design rules in order to improve yield.