Sender Verification for Encrypted Messaging Spam Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic messaging systems are vulnerable to spam messages, as they often rely on encryption that can circumvent spam filtering at network servers, making it difficult to prevent unwanted and unsolicited messages from being delivered to electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

The system sends a first unencrypted or low-encrypted message to determine if it is spam, and if not, subsequent messages are encrypted at a higher level only if the sender device is eligible based on identifiers and trustworthiness scores, ensuring that spam messages are filtered out by network servers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If encryption is used to protect message privacy, then message security is improved, but spam filtering capability deteriorates because encrypted messages cannot be analyzed by network servers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage privacyVSAvoidspam filtering
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The messaging process is segmented into two distinct phases: an initial unencrypted phase for spam filtering and analysis, followed by an encrypted phase for private communication. This allows the system to maintain both spam filtering capability and message privacy by applying encryption only after spam detection is complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary spam filtering and analysis using unencrypted messages before establishing encrypted communication. By conducting spam detection in advance on the clear text version of the message, the system can prevent spam from reaching the recipient while still allowing encrypted communication for legitimate messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If network servers analyze messages to filter spam, then spam detection is improved, but message privacy deteriorates because servers can read message content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespam detectionVSAvoidmessage privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The communication process is divided into two stages: first, unencrypted messages are analyzed by network servers for spam detection; second, legitimate messages are retransmitted with encryption applied. This segmentation ensures that privacy is maintained for legitimate communications while allowing necessary analysis for spam filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Spam detection is performed as a preliminary action on unencrypted messages before encrypted communication is established. This allows the system to filter harmful content without permanently compromising the privacy of legitimate messages, as encryption is applied afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If all messages are encrypted by default, then message security is improved, but system complexity increases due to eligibility verification requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage securityVSAvoideligibility verification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different encryption characteristics to different senders based on their trustworthiness scores and eligibility status. Trusted senders receive full encryption benefits, while untrusted senders are blocked or subjected to enhanced verification. This local differentiation optimizes security without uniformly increasing complexity for all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts encryption parameters and eligibility criteria based on sender trustworthiness scores. By changing the encryption level and verification requirements as parameters based on sender reputation, the system maintains high security for trusted communications while reducing overhead for verified senders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12262197B2Sender verification for encrypted electronic messaging
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 APPLE INC
  • US12262197B2 patent drawing
  • US12262197B2 patent drawing
  • US12262197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject disclosure provides systems and methods for sender verification for encrypted electronic messaging. The discloses systems and methods may facilitate reducing or preventing spam messages between electronic devices. An electronic device may determine, prior to sending an electronic message to another device with a first level of encryption that is higher than a second level of encryption, whether the electronic device is eligible to send the message with the first level of encryption. If an electronic device determines that it is ineligible to send the message with the first level of encryption to another electronic device, a first message from the electronic device to the other electronic device may be sent with the second level of encryption as part of an unencrypted or low encryption handshake between the devices.