Inference Workflow for Sensor-Aware Manufacturing Defect Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inference systems face inefficiencies due to the need to manually prioritize sensor data and user input, leading to time-consuming processes and increased costs in making inferences about manufacturing defects and countermeasures.

Innovation Solution

An inference apparatus that classifies questions as qualitative or quantitative, determines the use of sensor data or user input based on acquirability, and uses a determiner to select the appropriate data for inference, thereby streamlining the inference process without increasing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensor data and user input are manually prioritized for each monitoring target device, then the inference accuracy is improved, but the preparation time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinference accuracyVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of questions into qualitative and quantitative types, and pre-establishes the correspondence between question types and data sources (sensor data for quantitative, user input for qualitative). This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for manual prioritization during actual inference operations, resolving the contradiction between inference accuracy and preparation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The inference apparatus automatically determines which data source to use based on the question type classification, without requiring manual configuration or prioritization settings. The system serves itself by autonomously selecting appropriate data sources, thereby eliminating time-consuming manual setup while maintaining accurate inference results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If sensor data is always prioritized for quantitative questions, then the objectivity of inference is improved, but the system becomes complex when sensors are unavailable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity of inferenceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts data source selection based on sensor availability. When sensors are available, quantitative questions use sensor data for objective inference; when sensors are unavailable, the system automatically switches to user input. This dynamic adaptability maintains inference objectivity while avoiding system complexity through straightforward conditional logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the data source parameter based on sensor availability status. For quantitative questions, the data source parameter switches between sensor data (when available) and user input (when unavailable), maintaining inference objectivity without requiring complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual prioritization of data sources is performed for each device, then the inference precision is improved, but the implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinference precisionVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The inference apparatus implements a universal question classification mechanism that works across all monitoring target devices regardless of sensor availability. The same classification logic and data source selection rules apply universally, eliminating the need for device-specific manual prioritization configurations and reducing implementation costs while maintaining inference precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically determines appropriate data sources through question classification without requiring manual configuration for each device. This self-service approach maintains high inference precision through consistent data source selection while significantly reducing implementation costs by eliminating time-consuming manual setup work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20210397992A1Inference apparatus, information processing apparatus, inference method, program and recording medium
Publication Date: 2021.12.23 NS SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
  • US20210397992A1 patent drawing
  • US20210397992A1 patent drawing
  • US20210397992A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An inference apparatus makes an inference with respect to a phenomenon, the inference apparatus includes: a question acquirer configured to acquire a question related to the phenomenon; a question classifier configured to classify whether the question is a qualitative question or a quantitative question; a sensor classifier configured to classify whether sensor data is acquirable or not when the question is the quantitative question; a determiner configured to determine the sensor data as data to be used for the inference when the sensor data is acquirable and configured to determine input data by a user as the data to be used for the inference when the sensor data is unacquirable; and an inferrer configured to make the inference corresponding to the phenomenon using the data determined by the determiner.