Sensor Network Calibration via Proxy Reference Data Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Air quality regulatory monitors require frequent and costly calibration, making them economically infeasible for low-cost environmental sensor networks, especially in high spatial density networks, due to issues like missing data, high fieldwork costs, and inability to adapt to calibration drift.

Innovation Solution

A new calibration method that adjusts the gain and offset of sensor measurements to match the probability distribution of a proxy reference, combining data from regulatory stations, satellite instruments, and computer models, allowing for real-time updates without assuming sensor stability or relying on training data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If periodic co-location with reference monitor is used for calibration, then calibration accuracy is improved, but operational cost and fieldwork requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual reference monitor by aggregating and weighting data from multiple sources (regulatory monitors, satellite instruments, computer models) to generate proxy reference measurements. This virtual copy replaces the need for physical co-location with a single expensive reference monitor, significantly reducing fieldwork costs while maintaining calibration accuracy through diversified data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple data sources including regulatory air quality station data, satellite-based instrument data, and computer model predictions into a unified proxy reference. This merging of diverse sources creates a more robust reference system than any single source could provide, improving calibration reliability while eliminating the need for expensive physical co-location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If mobile reference monitor visits each sensor for calibration, then calibration coverage is improved, but reliability decreases due to insufficient pollutant variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration coverageVSAvoidcalibration reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges data from multiple fixed regulatory monitors across the network to create a unified proxy reference. This aggregation ensures sufficient pollutant variation is captured across the entire network, eliminating the reliability problem of mobile references that may visit locations during stagnant atmospheric conditions. The combined data from multiple geographic locations guarantees adequate variation for reliable calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from temporal calibration (mobile reference visiting sensors at different times) to spatial calibration (using data from multiple fixed regulatory monitors across different locations). This dimensional shift from time-based to space-based calibration ensures sufficient pollutant variation is captured through geographic diversity rather than temporal sampling, improving reliability while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If blind calibration using cross-correlations is used, then ground truth data requirements are reduced, but robustness against missing data decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata requirementsVSAvoidrobustness against missing data
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources with different temporal and spatial characteristics to create the proxy reference. This diversification means that if one data source has missing data, other sources can compensate, providing robustness against data gaps. The weighted combination of regulatory monitors, satellite data, and model predictions ensures continuous calibration capability even when individual sources have interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the weighting parameters of different data sources in the proxy reference based on data quality and availability. When certain sources have missing or low-quality data, the system automatically changes the weights to rely more on available sources, maintaining calibration robustness without requiring perfect data from all sources. This adaptive parameter adjustment provides flexibility in handling data gaps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If data fusion with atmospheric model is used, then operational cost is reduced, but traceability and sensor stability assumptions are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational costVSAvoidtraceability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a proxy reference as an intermediary between raw sensor data and calibrated results. This proxy reference, constructed from weighted combinations of traceable sources (regulatory monitors with certified calibrations, satellite instruments, and validated computer models), provides the traceability chain that pure atmospheric models lack. The proxy reference acts as a mediator that maintains traceability while enabling low-cost calibration of sensor networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11711429B2Method for calibrating networks of environmental sensors
Publication Date: 2023.07.25 AEROQUAL
  • US11711429B2 patent drawing
  • US11711429B2 patent drawing
  • US11711429B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Multiple low cost individual sensors communicate with a server. A proxy sensor communicates with the server. The server periodically compares information from the individual sensors with information from the proxy sensor. The server validates and accepts information from individual sensors. The server changes gain and offset values for individual sensors providing information that is not validated by the comparing.