Sensor Channel Selection With Quality Threshold Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Engineers face challenges in optimizing sensor arrangements for devices, as they need to select the right combination and quality of sensors to meet output requirements while minimizing costs and complexity, given the vast array of sensor options and their varying costs and accuracies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize machine learning to identify and assemble optimized sensor combinations by selecting sensor channels and determining threshold quality criteria, using a sensor optimizer to generate optimized sensor sets and sensitivity balancer to ensure cost-effective solutions that meet performance targets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a comprehensive array of high-quality sensors is selected to meet output requirements, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor qualityVSAvoidsensor arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sensor selection process into distinct functional modules: a sensor optimizer that generates optimized sensor sets with threshold values, a channel selector that validates sensor combinations against output requirements, and a sensitivity balancer that determines quality thresholds. This segmentation transforms the overwhelming comprehensive selection task into manageable sequential steps, reducing device complexity while maintaining measurement precision through systematic evaluation of sensor combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If more sensors are used to achieve required output states, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but the number of sensors and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput requirement fulfillmentVSAvoidnumber of sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by determining threshold values for sensor quality criteria that define the minimum necessary sensor performance rather than requiring all sensors to exceed maximum quality levels. The sensitivity balancer identifies the precise quality threshold needed for each sensor channel to meet output requirements, eliminating excessive sensor quality specifications and reducing the number of high-cost sensors while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts sensor quality parameter thresholds based on specific output requirements and sensor combination performance. The sensitivity balancer modifies the quality criterion thresholds for different sensor channels according to their individual contributions to output states, allowing the system to use fewer sensors by optimizing their quality parameters rather than uniformly specifying high-quality sensors across the board.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If multiple sensor combinations are evaluated to find the most cost-effective option, then cost efficiency is improved, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost effectivenessVSAvoidsensor selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-generating optimized sensor sets with determined threshold values using the sensor optimizer before the actual sensor selection process. This preliminary optimization creates a filtered set of candidate sensor combinations that are already evaluated for cost-effectiveness and performance, allowing engineers to quickly select from pre-validated options rather than evaluating all possible sensor combinations from scratch, significantly reducing selection time while maintaining cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual sensor selection and evaluation processes with automated computational algorithms. The sensor optimizer, channel selector, and sensitivity balancer collectively substitute human engineering judgment with machine-based optimization that rapidly evaluates multiple sensor combinations, determines threshold values, and identifies cost-effective configurations without the time and resource expenditure required for comprehensive manual analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12105506B1System and method for identifying and assembling sensor combinations optimized for output requirements
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 REALITY ANALYTICS INC
  • US12105506B1 patent drawing
  • US12105506B1 patent drawing
  • US12105506B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are provided for identification of a combination of sensors suitable for achieving a set of output requirements, enabling assembly thereof. An arrangement of sensors is assembled according to an optimized sensor set, generated to define at least one sensor channel having a threshold value for at least one quality criterion. The sensor sets are generated by down-selection of the sensor channels from a previously tested set of available channels to a subset mapping to a set of required output states. Assignment of a threshold value for each sensor channel is based on a mapping of the value to a target value of a performance metric.