Vehicle Sensor Cleaning Control for Uneven Precipitation Exposure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle sensors, such as lidar, sonar, radar, and cameras, face compromised vision due to precipitation like snow, rain, or fog, which can degrade the navigation accuracy of autonomous vehicles, and existing cleaning systems face challenges in efficiently managing different sensor orientations and attributes without increasing hardware costs or power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A cleaning system that activates cleaning elements, such as nozzles or wipers, at frequencies tailored to the orientation and attributes of each sensor, prioritizing sensors more severely affected by precipitation, using a controller to determine optimal cleaning frequencies based on environmental conditions and vehicle attributes, allowing for improved vision without hardware changes or increased power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cleaning elements are activated at the same frequency for all sensors, then the cleaning system is simple to control, but sensors with different orientations and attributes experience different levels of precipitation accumulation, leading to compromised vision for some sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor visionVSAvoidcleaning control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different cleaning frequencies to different sensors based on their specific orientations and attributes. Forward-facing sensors, which accumulate precipitation more severely, are cleaned at higher frequencies compared to rearward-facing or sideward-facing sensors. This differentiated approach ensures each sensor receives appropriate cleaning attention tailored to its exposure conditions, maintaining reliable vision across all sensors without uniformly increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If cleaning frequency is increased for all sensors, then sensor vision is maintained better, but power consumption and hardware requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor visionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by applying cleaning only where and when needed based on precipitation accumulation risk. Rather than uniformly cleaning all sensors at high frequency, the system selectively increases cleaning frequency for forward-facing sensors that are most severely affected by precipitation, while maintaining lower frequencies for less affected sensors. This approach maintains sensor vision reliability for critical sensors without unnecessarily increasing overall power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If cleaning elements are activated independently for each sensor, then cleaning can be optimized for each sensor's specific conditions, but the control system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by configuring each cleaning element with parameters tailored to its associated sensor's orientation and attributes. Forward-facing sensors have cleaning elements set to higher activation frequencies, while rearward-facing and sideward-facing sensors use lower frequencies. This per-sensor optimization achieves adaptability to local conditions while the controller manages the differentiated settings through organized groups, balancing versatility with manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively maintains sensor vision by prioritizing cleaning frequencies for sensors most affected by precipitation, enhancing navigation accuracy without the need for larger or more powerful hardware, thus improving overall vehicle performance.

Implementation Method 1

Activating the cleaning elements may then cause compressed gas, such as air, to be emitted from the nozzles to clean the sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressed gas emission: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS12043225B1Cleaning vehicle sensors
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 ZOOX INC
  • US12043225B1 patent drawing
  • US12043225B1 patent drawing
  • US12043225B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for cleaning sensors of a vehicle. An attribute of the surrounding environment (e.g., type of precipitation, intensity of precipitation, etc.) is determined along with orientations and/or attributes of the sensors (e.g. fields-of-view, focal lengths, spectral ranges, etc). Cleaning frequencies are then be determined based, at least in part, on the attribute of the environment together with the orientations and/or attributes of the sensors. Cleaning elements are then activated at the determined frequencies to clean the sensors. In some examples, the cleaning frequencies may be determined based additionally on an attribute of travel of the vehicle (e.g. direction of travel of the vehicle, speed of the vehicle, etc.).