Autonomous Driving Control via Sensor Confidence-Based Action Gating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-order autonomous driving vehicles face safety issues when sensors fail, leading to sudden transfer of control rights to drivers, compromising driving safety and user experience.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent driving method that determines a confidence level of sensing sectors based on sensor faults and adjusts execution strategies for autonomous driving actions to prevent sudden control transfers, allowing or prohibiting actions based on confidence levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensor fault detection is implemented with direct control right transfer to driver, then driving safety is compromised due to sudden handover, but maintaining autonomous driving function requires keeping control rights with system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoidautonomous driving experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining confidence levels of sensing sectors before executing autonomous driving actions. When sensor faults are detected, the system proactively adjusts execution strategies in advance, allowing ongoing actions to complete while preventing new actions that would require faulty sensing data. This preliminary assessment and strategic adjustment prevents sudden control handovers while maintaining autonomous driving functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts execution strategies based on real-time confidence level assessments. When sensor faults occur, the control strategy transitions from full autonomous execution to a restricted mode where actions are evaluated against confidence thresholds. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain autonomous driving experience in safe conditions while ensuring driving safety when sensor reliability deteriorates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If autonomous driving actions are executed based on faulty sensor data, then autonomous driving function is maintained, but driving safety deteriorates due to incorrect decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous driving function levelVSAvoiddriving safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by assessing confidence levels for specific sensing sectors rather than uniformly disabling autonomous driving. Each sensing sector is evaluated independently, and execution strategies are adjusted locally for actions dependent on specific sectors. This allows the autonomous driving function to continue at high level for actions with sufficient confidence while restricting only those actions affected by sensor faults.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring sensor status and confidence levels, then adjusting execution strategies accordingly. When sensor faults are detected, the feedback loop triggers strategic adjustments that prevent execution of actions dependent on unreliable sensing data. This closed-loop feedback mechanism maintains autonomous driving functionality while ensuring safety by adapting to real-time sensor conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If sensor fault handling immediately terminates autonomous driving mode, then driving safety is improved, but autonomous driving experience deteriorates due to frequent mode switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoidautonomous driving work duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of confidence levels before determining execution strategies. When sensor faults occur, rather than immediately terminating autonomous mode, the system proactively evaluates which actions can still be safely executed. This preliminary action allows the system to maintain autonomous driving mode for actions with sufficient confidence, extending autonomous driving duration while preserving safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts autonomous driving mode rather than statically terminating it. The execution strategy transitions from full autonomous execution to a confidence-based restricted mode, allowing the system to maintain high-level autonomous functionality for actions with adequate confidence while restricting actions dependent on faulty sensors. This dynamic adaptation extends autonomous driving duration without compromising safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250388236A1Intelligent Driving Method and Apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 YINWANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • US20250388236A1 patent drawing
  • US20250388236A1 patent drawing
  • US20250388236A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent driving method and apparatus are related to the field of intelligent driving. The method includes determining a confidence level of a sensing sector based on a fault condition of a sensor included in the sensing sector. The method further includes determining, based on the confidence level, an execution strategy corresponding to an autonomous driving action. The method further includes executing the autonomous driving action according to the execution strategy.