Sensor Control Device for Mutual Interference Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sensor systems face mutual interference issues when the number of sensor units exceeds a certain limit, leading to unnecessary waiting times and inefficient light projection periods, as they rely on fixed delay times and light projection orders without considering the degree of interference.

Innovation Solution

A sensor control device with a light projection control part and a light projection timing setting part that automatically detects mutual interference and sets periodic light projection timings for each sensor unit based on detection results, preventing overlap and optimizing light projection periods according to the number of units and their types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed delay times are used to prevent mutual interference, then mutual interference is prevented for a limited number of sensor units, but the system cannot handle more sensor units and generates unnecessary waiting times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of mutual interferenceVSAvoidwaiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the light projection period variable rather than fixed. The control device dynamically adjusts the light projection period based on the detection result from each sensor unit, allowing the system to adapt to different numbers of sensor units and eliminate unnecessary waiting times while preventing mutual interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using detection results from each sensor unit to adjust the light projection period. The control device receives detection results indicating whether mutual interference occurred, and uses this feedback to optimize the light projection period for subsequent operations, resolving the contradiction between preventing interference and minimizing waiting time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the light projection period is set based on the upper limit of sensor units, then mutual interference is prevented for maximum units, but unnecessary waiting time is generated when fewer units are used

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of mutual interferenceVSAvoidlight projection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the light projection period based on the actual number of sensor units in use rather than using a fixed period based on the upper limit. This allows the system to maintain reliable interference prevention while optimizing productivity by eliminating unnecessary waiting time when fewer sensor units are deployed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If sensor units are operated simultaneously, then detection speed is improved, but mutual interference occurs between multiple sensor units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidprevention of mutual interference
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by controlling sensor units to operate in periodic cycles with optimized timing. The control device sets the light projection period to allow simultaneous operation of multiple sensor units while preventing mutual interference through proper timing coordination, thus maintaining both high detection speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Quantity of substance

If a large number of sensor units are used, then detection coverage is improved, but mutual interference cannot be prevented with fixed delay times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of sensor unitsVSAvoidprevention of mutual interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the light projection period based on the actual number of sensor units deployed. This allows the system to support a large number of sensor units for improved detection coverage while maintaining reliable interference prevention through optimized timing that adjusts to the system scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively prevents mutual interference and minimizes light projection periods, ensuring efficient detection of workpieces by dynamically adjusting light projection timings, even with a large number of sensor units, while maintaining comfort and improving response speed.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor unit (100) including a light projection part (110) and a light reception part (120)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10705248B2Periodic light projecting sensor control device and sensor system ensuring mutual interference does not occur
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 OMRON CORP
  • US10705248B2 patent drawing
  • US10705248B2 patent drawing
  • US10705248B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sensor control device and a sensor system are provided through which it is possible to automatically detect whether mutual interference occurs for a plurality of sensor units, and it is possible to automatically set periodic light projection timings for preventing mutual interference. A sensor control device includes a light projection control part configured to instruct a light projection operation for each of a plurality of sensor units and a light projection timing setting part configured to set periodic light projection timings when each of the sensor units is periodically operated based on results of light projection control for each of the sensor units and detection results of each of the sensor units.