Redundant Sensor-Controller Safety Architecture for 3D Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety systems struggle to implement complex safety functions, such as human-robot collaboration and autonomous vehicle applications, due to performance limitations in real-time systems caused by waste heat, cost, and size constraints, making it difficult to integrate high-quality safety functions that require image or 3D data processing.

Innovation Solution

A staggered, redundant, and diverse security architecture is implemented using single-channel sensor systems and programmable controllers, where both components process safety functions sequentially and compare results to ensure agreement within specified limits, avoiding the need for duplicate hardware and reducing waste heat issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If complex safety functions are implemented on a single sensor with internal processing, then integration ease is improved, but performance is limited by waste heat, cost, and size constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration easeVSAvoidperformance quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the safety system into two separate segments: a sensor that collects data and a controller that processes safety functions. This segmentation allows the sensor to remain simple and integrated while the controller handles complex processing with adequate cooling and computational resources, resolving the contradiction between integration ease and performance quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the complex processing function from the sensor dimension to the controller dimension in the system architecture. By distributing functions across different system components rather than concentrating them in one location, the system achieves both easy sensor integration and high-quality safety processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If redundant or diverse implementation of safety functions is used on the sensor, then error control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the redundant and diverse implementation of safety functions from the sensor and relocates them to the controller. This allows the sensor to remain simple while the controller implements comprehensive error control mechanisms including redundant processing and diverse algorithm execution, resolving the contradiction between error control and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If high-quality safety functions requiring image or 3D data processing are implemented, then safety function quality is improved, but waste heat and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety function qualityVSAvoidwaste heat
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a controller as an intermediary component between the sensor and the safety output. The controller acts as a dedicated processing unit that can handle computationally intensive image and 3D data processing with proper thermal management, while the sensor remains a simple data collection device. This intermediary approach allows high-quality safety functions to be implemented without excessive waste heat in the sensor itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4325308B1Security system and method with a security system
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 SICK AG
  • EP4325308B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4325308B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4325308B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Method with a safety system and safety system (1) with at least one sensor system (2) with at least one sensor (7) in a first housing (3) and at least one programmable controller (4) in a second housing (5), wherein the sensor system (2) has a first control and evaluation unit (6), wherein the first control and evaluation unit (6) is configured to evaluate sensor data from the sensor (7) of the sensor system (2) and to generate first result signals, the programmable controller (4) has a second control and evaluation unit (8), wherein the sensor system (2) is configured to transmit sensor data to the second control and evaluation unit (8), wherein the second control and evaluation unit (8) is configured to evaluate sensor data from the sensor (7) of the sensor system (2) and to generate second result signals, wherein a comparison unit (9) is provided, wherein the comparison unit (9) is configuredto compare the first result signals and the second result signals with each other and generate reliable output signals.