Spatial Sensor Data Evaluation for Probabilistic Drivable Area Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods for evaluating spatially resolved actual sensor data in driver assistance and automated systems require high sensor resolution to accurately identify free areas, potentially missing hidden objects and being inefficient with lower resolutions.
Innovation Solution
A method that compares spatially resolved expectations of sensor data with actual data, accounting for error sources like measurement inaccuracies and map data inaccuracies, to determine the drivability of areas and output a property probability, allowing for accurate identification of free areas even with lower sensor resolution.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If high sensor resolution is used to accurately identify free areas, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
A probabilistic occupancy grid map serves as an intermediary representation between raw sensor data and drivability determination. Instead of directly processing high-resolution sensor data to identify free areas, the system converts sensor measurements into probability values for each grid cell, representing the likelihood of occupancy. This intermediary probabilistic map enables accurate free area identification while allowing the use of lower-resolution sensors, as the probabilistic framework accumulates evidence over time and multiple measurements.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes the parameter representation from deterministic binary occupancy (occupied/not occupied) to probabilistic occupancy (0-1 probability values). This parameter transformation allows the system to express uncertainty and partial information, enabling lower-resolution sensors to contribute meaningful data. The probabilistic framework integrates multiple low-resolution measurements to achieve high-confidence determinations about free areas, resolving the contradiction between sensor resolution and measurement precision.
2Measurement precision
If high sensor resolution is used to detect hidden objects, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time for data processing increases
Solution Approach 1:
The environment is segmented into a grid of discrete cells, with each cell maintaining an independent probability of occupancy. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple grid cells simultaneously, reducing overall processing time. Instead of analyzing the entire high-resolution sensor image sequentially to detect hidden objects, the system processes each grid cell independently, updating occupancy probabilities based on sensor measurements that correspond to each cell.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary actions by continuously maintaining and updating the probabilistic occupancy grid map even when no immediate drivability decision is needed. This ongoing preliminary processing pre-computes occupancy probabilities for all grid cells, so when a drivability determination is required, the system can quickly query the pre-computed probabilities without performing full sensor data analysis, significantly reducing decision latency.
3Device complexity
If lower sensor resolution is used to reduce device complexity, then reliability decreases due to inability to accurately identify free areas
Solution Approach 1:
The system maintains continuous useful action by continuously updating the probabilistic occupancy grid map with incoming sensor measurements, even at low resolution. Rather than waiting for high-resolution data or performing batch processing, the system continuously integrates each sensor measurement into the probabilistic model, incrementally improving the accuracy of free area identification over time. This continuous accumulation of probabilistic evidence compensates for the lower instantaneous resolution of the sensors.
Solution Approach 2:
The probabilistic occupancy grid map provides feedback about the confidence level of free area identification for each grid cell. The system can query the probability values to determine when sufficient confidence has been achieved for safe navigation decisions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt its behavior based on the current reliability of the occupancy information, enabling reliable free area identification even with lower-resolution sensors by accumulating measurements until confidence thresholds are met.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for evaluating spatially resolved actual sensor data recorded with at least one sensor. The actual sensor data are read first. A location and an orientation of the actual sensor data are ascertained. A spatially resolved map with spatially resolved expectations of sensor data is read. The spatially resolved expectations of the sensor data are compared to the actual sensor data. A property can be ascertained from the comparison. An estimation can take place as to what influence an error source has on the comparison of the spatially resolved expectations of the sensor data to the actual sensor data. It is determined whether or not the property is fulfilled, based on the comparison of the spatially resolved expectations of the sensor data to the actual sensor data and based on the estimation of the influence of the error source. The property and a property probability are output.


