Sensor Data Explainability for Facility State Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to effectively monitor and manage the operational state of facilities using sensor data, particularly in identifying critical factors influencing the state of industrial plants, and lack the ability to provide actionable insights for improving operational conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an apparatus with a learned model that analyzes sensor data to generate state indication values, identifies influential factor data, and provides actionable improvement operations based on detected signs of deteriorating conditions, using algorithms like LIME and SHAP for interpretable explanations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a learned model is used to analyze sensor data and identify critical factors, then the accuracy of facility state monitoring is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacility state monitoring accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces explanation algorithms (LIME, SHAP) as intermediary components between the learned model and the user interface. These intermediaries translate the complex internal workings of the machine learning model into comprehensible explanations about which sensor data points most strongly influence facility state predictions, thereby resolving the contradiction by maintaining high monitoring accuracy while reducing the perceived system complexity through interpretability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where the explanation results are continuously provided back to users, allowing them to understand and verify the model's reasoning. This feedback mechanism enables users to trust and effectively use the complex learned model without being overwhelmed by its complexity, as they can see which specific sensor readings are driving the facility state assessments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If explanation algorithms like LIME and SHAP are implemented, then the interpretability of model predictions is improved, but the computational time and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel interpretabilityVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting and explaining only the most influential sensor data points rather than analyzing all input data. The explanation algorithms identify and highlight the top contributing factors to facility state predictions, providing sufficient interpretability without the need to process and explain every single data point, thus balancing interpretability with computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts parameters such as the number of explanations generated, the granularity of detail provided, and the threshold for significance when applying LIME and SHAP algorithms. By changing these parameters based on computational resource availability and user needs, the system can optimize the balance between providing comprehensive interpretability and maintaining acceptable processing times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If the system provides detailed explanations of influential factors, then the actionable insights for improvement are enhanced, but the information overload to users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactionable insights qualityVSAvoidinformation presentation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different levels and types of explanations tailored to specific user needs and contexts. Rather than presenting uniform detailed explanations for all scenarios, the system adapts the granularity, format, and depth of information based on the specific facility state, user role, and query type, thereby enhancing actionable insights while avoiding information overload through localized customization of information presentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12591210B2Apparatus, method, and computer-readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 YOKOGAWA ELECTRIC CORP
  • US12591210B2 patent drawing
  • US12591210B2 patent drawing
  • US12591210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus is provided comprising a first acquisition unit for acquiring a data set including a plurality of types of measurement data indicating a state of an object, a supplying unit for supplying, in response to the data set being input, the data set acquired by the first acquisition unit to a model that outputs a state indication value indicating classification of a state of the object, a first identification unit for identifying, when one of the state indication value is output from the model in response to one of the data set being supplied, at least one type of measurement data, among the plurality of types of measurement data, having a larger influence on the one state indication value than a reference, based on the one data set, and a display control unit for displaying the one state indication value and the at least one type of measurement data.