Sensor-Driven Feedback Loops for Dynamic Energy Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an effective method to dynamically manage energy usage and equipment operation based on asset-specific energy consumption data, leading to inefficiencies and potential equipment breakdowns, which are not adequately addressed by existing technologies.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that processes historical and current energy consumption data, breakdown frequency, and environmental characteristics to determine usage-based insurance premiums and generate alerts to adjust energy usage levels, operational characteristics, and sensor parameters, thereby optimizing energy management and reducing breakdown risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If energy consumption data is collected and processed for each physical asset, then energy management efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments energy management by creating separate feedback loops for each physical asset or location. Each loop processes energy consumption data independently, allowing granular control and optimization at the asset level while maintaining overall system coordination through the insurance premium mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary insurance premium mechanism that translates energy consumption data into financial incentives. This intermediary layer simplifies the control architecture by using economic signals rather than direct technical control, reducing system complexity while maintaining management efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If real-time energy consumption monitoring is implemented, then equipment breakdown risk is reduced, but energy costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment breakdown riskVSAvoidenergy costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops that continuously monitor energy consumption data and provide real-time information about equipment status. This feedback enables early detection of abnormal patterns that may indicate impending breakdowns, allowing preventive actions that reduce equipment failure risk while optimizing energy usage timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts insurance premiums based on real-time energy consumption patterns and equipment risk levels. This dynamic pricing mechanism aligns energy costs with actual equipment risk, incentivizing energy-efficient operations that also reduce breakdown risk, thereby balancing monitoring costs with reliability benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20230177614A1Computer systems and computer-implemented methods utilizing sensor-driven dynamically adjustable feedback loops to manage equipment based risk on an asset specific level of energy data usage
Publication Date: 2023.06.08 HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION & INSURANCE CO
  • US20230177614A1 patent drawing
  • US20230177614A1 patent drawing
  • US20230177614A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, the present invention provides for an exemplary inventive system that may include executable program code and a computer processor which, when executing the particular program code, is configured to perform operations of: receiving, for a population of energy consuming physical assets, asset-specific historical data and asset-specific current energy consumption data from utility meter(s), sensor(s), or both; determining, for each respective physical asset category, each respective frequency of breakdowns and each respective average severity of each breakdown; determining, an adjusted breakdown loss value per each physical asset for each respective physical asset category; determining a respective average current energy consumption value per each physical asset for each respective physical asset category; associating each respective energy consuming location to a particular physical asset category; generating, based on usage-based breakdown insurance premium value of the respective energy consuming location, an electronic alert configured to affect the location-specific level of energy usage of the at least one energy consuming physical asset.