Sensor Fault Detection via Parameter Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fault detection methods for sensor arrangements during operation are limited in detecting deviations in both the sensing elements and the readout chain without additional complex hardware, which can malfunction, and may interfere with the physical quantity being measured, especially in power-critical applications and can only be performed during idle times.

Innovation Solution

Modulating physical parameters of the sensor arrangement using configuration values, comparing the output with a reference output to detect deterministic alterations, allowing for continuous fault detection without additional hardware by utilizing the existing measurement signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If predetermined stimuli are applied to test the sensor arrangement, then fault detection capability is improved, but the testing can only be performed during idle times when the sensor is not in use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidtesting availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous fault detection during sensor operation by modulating physical parameters of existing sensing elements rather than requiring separate test stimuli during idle periods. The sensing elements continuously provide both measurement and self-test functions through parameter modulation, eliminating idle time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The sensing elements serve dual purposes: they perform both normal measurement functions and self-test functions by modulating their physical parameters. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated test hardware and allows testing during operational periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If additional hardware is added for fault detection, then testing coverage is improved, but device complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting coverageVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing elements perform self-testing by modulating their own physical parameters and evaluating their responses. This self-service capability eliminates the need for additional external test hardware, reducing device complexity and power consumption while maintaining comprehensive testing coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Existing sensing elements are utilized for both measurement and fault detection functions. By making the sensing elements multi-functional, the patent avoids adding separate test hardware, thereby reducing overall device complexity and power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If additional hardware is added for fault detection, then testing coverage is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting coverageVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing elements conduct self-tests by modulating their own physical parameters without requiring additional powered test hardware. This approach maintains comprehensive testing coverage while avoiding the power consumption associated with separate test equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If predetermined stimuli are applied for testing, then fault detection is improved, but interference with the physical quantity being measured occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic modulation to physical parameters of sensing elements during operation. This periodic action enables fault detection through parameter variation without requiring separate test stimuli that would interfere with continuous measurement of the physical quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying external test stimuli that interfere with measurements, the patent modulates physical parameters (such as bias current, voltage, or frequency) of the sensing elements themselves. This parameter change approach enables fault detection while maintaining continuous, interference-free measurement of the target physical quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3382344B1Fault detection
Publication Date: 2021.12.15 MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES SA
  • EP3382344B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3382344B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP3382344B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method for detecting a fault in a sensor arrangement (100, 210) is described. The method comprising modulating (410) at least one physical parameter of the sensor arrangement (100, 210) by a configuration value (130), wherein the at least one physical parameter of the sensor arrangement (100, 210) is modulated during operation of the sensor arrangement (100, 210), comparing (420) an output (120) of the sensor arrangement (100, 210) with a reference output (150) related to the modulated at least one physical parameter and detecting (430) a fault based on the comparison. Furthermore, also a corresponding processing circuit is described.