Sensor Data Fusion for Aircraft Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for merging sensor measurements in aircraft do not reliably determine the probability of false alarms, which can lead to incorrect identification of sensor anomalies.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates detection deviations for each sensor, compares them to predetermined thresholds, and determines the probability of false alarms to accurately identify sensor anomalies, allowing for a more reliable estimation of flight parameters by merging sensor data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a tolerance band method is used to detect sensor anomalies, then the searching for possible anomalies is simplified, but the probability of false alarm cannot be reliably determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection simplicityVSAvoidfalse alarm probability determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the anomaly detection problem from a simple tolerance band comparison to a statistical hypothesis testing framework by changing the parameters to include detection deviations, predetermined thresholds, and probability calculations. This allows reliable determination of false alarm probabilities while maintaining operational simplicity through automated statistical computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple sensors are used to improve estimation accuracy, then the reliability of flight parameter estimation is improved, but the complexity of measurements merging increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight parameter estimation accuracyVSAvoidmeasurements merging complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the detection deviation of each sensor is computed based on the difference between its measurement and the estimated parameter derived from other sensors. This feedback loop enables automatic identification and exclusion of anomalous sensors, improving estimation reliability while managing complexity through systematic statistical processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If sensor measurements are merged to provide a consolidated value, then the estimation of flight parameters is improved, but the ability to detect actual sensor anomalies decreases due to false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter estimation accuracyVSAvoidanomaly detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary anomaly detection and classification before final parameter estimation by computing detection deviations and comparing them to predetermined thresholds. This preliminary action identifies potentially anomalous sensors, allowing the merging process to either exclude them or apply appropriate weighting, thereby maintaining measurement precision while reducing false alarm impacts on anomaly detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10041808B2Method of sensor data fusion
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US10041808B2 patent drawing
  • US10041808B2 patent drawing
  • US10041808B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for merging measurements of a flight parameter of an aircraft, from measurements (y1, y2, y3, y4) of this parameter supplied respectively by a plurality of sensors (C1, C2, C3, C4), comprising: for each sensor (C1; C2; C3; C4), computing a deviation (T1; T2; T3; T4), proportional to the absolute value of a difference between a measurement (y1, y2, y3; y4) supplied by this sensor, and an estimation of the parameter computed from the measurements supplied by the other sensors; comparing each deviation to a corresponding threshold (Td1; Td2; Td3; Td4); based on the comparisons, determining the presence or not of an anomaly on one of the sensors with a determined total probability of false alarm; and merging measurements to provide a final estimation of the parameter ({circumflex over (x)}).