Multi-Sensor Fusion Using Conditional Belief Functions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information fusion schemes for multi-sensor systems are limited in their ability to account for various types of knowledge regarding the dependency, competence, and sincerity of sensors, particularly when sensors are in different operating states, such as being competent and independent or non-independent.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for calculating a merged belief function that takes into account the operating states of sensors by using conditional belief functions and a knowledge base to represent the propensity of sensors in specific states, employing operators like the unnormalized Dempster's rule and cautious rule based on predefined associations between sensor states and merge operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing information fusion schemes are used, then the fusion process is simple, but the ability to account for various types of knowledge regarding sensor dependency, competence, and operating states is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of information fusionVSAvoidcomplexity of fusion scheme
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fusion process by introducing conditional belief functions that separate different operating states of sensors. Each sensor state (competent, non-competent, independent, non-independent) is handled by a specific merge operator, dividing the complex fusion problem into manageable state-specific sub-problems while maintaining overall reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the merge operator selection dynamic rather than static. The system automatically selects appropriate merge operators (Dempster's rule, cautious rule, etc.) based on the current operating states of sensors, allowing the fusion scheme to adapt to changing sensor conditions and incorporate various knowledge types about sensor behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If conditional belief functions and multiple merge operators are used to account for sensor operating states, then the accuracy of information fusion improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of belief function mergingVSAvoidcomplexity of calculation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining a library of merge operators corresponding to different sensor operating states (Dempster's rule for independent competent sensors, cautious rule for non-independent sensors, etc.). This preparation allows the system to quickly select and apply the appropriate operator without performing complex analysis during the fusion process itself, maintaining precision while reducing computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8615480B2Method, device and system for the fusion of information originating from several sensors
Publication Date: 2013.12.24 THALES SA
  • US8615480B2 patent drawing
  • US8615480B2 patent drawing
  • US8615480B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method, device and system for fusion of information originating from several sensors. The invention includes a mechanism for fusion of belief functions. To apply this mechanism, various information, knowledge and operations are modelled within the framework of the theory of belief functions: information provided by the sensors, knowledge regarding the propensity of the sensors to be in a given operating state, and merge operators for each operating state considered.