Vehicle Sensor Fusion Track Switching for Sensor Failure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face control malfunctions when any one of their sensor fusion devices, such as cameras, radars, or Lidars, fails to recognize objects, leading to a lack of redundancy in object detection.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system that processes image data, radar data, and Lidar data to generate a first sensor fusion track, calculates the reliability of each sensor, and switches to a second sensor fusion track based on a predetermined threshold, allowing for redundancy by using alternative sensor data for braking and deceleration control, even if one sensor fails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensor fusion is used for object detection, then measurement precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates when a sensor fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection precisionVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes multiple sensor fusion tracks (first track using all sensors, second track using subset of sensors) and calculates reliability thresholds in advance. When a sensor failure is detected, the system can immediately switch to the pre-prepared alternative track without interruption, cushioning against the reliability deterioration that would otherwise occur during sensor failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the composition parameters of the sensor fusion track based on sensor reliability. When a sensor fails, the system transitions from the first sensor fusion track (using all sensors for high precision) to the second sensor fusion track (using remaining sensors with calculated reliability), adapting the system configuration to maintain operation under changed conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If alternative sensor fusion track is prepared for redundancy, then reliability is improved during sensor failure, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsensor fusion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor fusion system is segmented into multiple independent tracks: the first sensor fusion track uses all sensors for normal operation, while the second sensor fusion track uses a subset of sensors for failure scenarios. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliability through redundancy without requiring complete reconfiguration, as each track is a self-contained processing path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects between the first and second sensor fusion tracks based on sensor operational status. The controller adjusts which track is active in real-time, enabling the system to maintain high reliability during sensor failures while avoiding the permanent complexity of maintaining all possible sensor combinations simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If braking amount is limited when using alternative sensor fusion track, then safety is maintained during sensor failure, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol safetyVSAvoidvehicle response effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts the braking amount parameter based on the active sensor fusion track. When the second track is active (indicating sensor failure), the braking amount is limited to a predetermined ratio to maintain safety margins. When the first track is active (all sensors functioning), full braking capability is available, maximizing productivity and response effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240061424A1Vehicle and control method incorporating sensor fusion
Publication Date: 2024.02.22 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20240061424A1 patent drawing
  • US20240061424A1 patent drawing
  • US20240061424A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a camera provided to obtain image data, radar provided to obtain radar data, Lidar provided to obtain Lidar data, and a controller configured to process the image data, the radar data, and the Lidar data to generate a first sensor fusion track, where the controller calculates reliability of at least one sensor in which an event does not occur among a plurality of sensors including the camera, the radar and the Lidar when the event for the sensor is detected, and changes from the first sensor fusion track to a second sensor fusion track based on the at least one sensor when the reliability is greater than or equal to a predetermined threshold, and where the controller is configured to control a braking amount or a deceleration amount of the vehicle based on the first sensor fusion track or the second sensor fusion track.