Multimodal Sensor Fusion With Uncertainty Gating for Autonomous Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in reliably fusing data from multiple sensors due to noise and uncertainty, leading to potential errors and failures, especially when encountering novel or faulty data, as conventional methods do not effectively capture sensor drift or provide reliable confidence scores.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an uncertainty-aware multimodal Bayesian fusion framework using Bayesian deep neural networks (B-DNNs) to estimate predictive uncertainty, which calculates aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties and dynamically gates sensor contributions based on these estimates, ensuring robust sensor fusion for safer driving controls and path planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional sensor fusion methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to handle noisy and uncertain sensor data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of sensor fusionVSAvoidcomplexity of fusion framework
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sensor fusion process into distinct Bayesian neural network modules, each handling specific sensor modalities independently before combining results. This modular segmentation allows each module to be optimized for its specific sensor type while maintaining overall system reliability through probabilistic integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces uncertainty estimates as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between raw sensor data and final fusion decisions. By computing and utilizing uncertainty metrics from each sensor modality, the system can dynamically weight contributions and handle noisy data without requiring complete redesign of the fusion architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If uncertainty estimation is added to improve reliability, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases due to additional computational requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of sensor dataVSAvoidcomplexity of uncertainty calculation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs uncertainty estimation as a preliminary action during the neural network inference process itself, rather than as a separate post-processing step. By integrating uncertainty calculation into the forward propagation through Bayesian neural networks, the system obtains precision measurements without adding significant computational overhead to the overall pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The Bayesian neural networks perform self-service by automatically computing their own uncertainty estimates during inference. The probabilistic nature of B-DNNs allows them to generate both predictions and confidence measures in a single pass, eliminating the need for external uncertainty estimation modules and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic gating of sensor contributions is implemented, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases due to additional control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to noisy dataVSAvoidcomplexity of gating mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic gating through probabilistic weighting mechanisms that automatically adjust sensor contributions based on real-time uncertainty estimates. Instead of static fusion weights, the system dynamically modulates the influence of each sensor modality according to its current reliability, enabling adaptability without complex control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves adaptability by changing the parameter values (uncertainty estimates) that govern sensor contribution weights, rather than changing the structural complexity of the gating mechanism itself. By dynamically adjusting these parameters based on data quality, the system adapts to noisy conditions while maintaining a relatively simple fusion architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11983625B2Robust multimodal sensor fusion for autonomous driving vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 INTEL CORP
  • US11983625B2 patent drawing
  • US11983625B2 patent drawing
  • US11983625B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed for using neural network architectures to estimate predictive uncertainty measures, which quantify how much trust should be placed in the deep neural network (DNN) results. The techniques include measuring reliable uncertainty scores for a neural network, which are widely used in perception and decision-making tasks in automated driving. The uncertainty measurements are made with respect to both model uncertainty and data uncertainty, and may implement Bayesian neural networks or other types of neural networks.